Quote Originally Posted by Friske View Post
well, that's one way of hammering the brutal truth of no diversity at endgame what so ever. Even if his tone (and the archer's tone as well) was kind of unnecessary, he does have a point. As most offtanks are warriors anyway, their secondary job is to deal damage. Maybe not with Blood for blood though.
But why post this... what's the point of apparently 'humiliating' people who are obviously ignorant about how there is literally no customisation at endgame? You can blatantly tell that the guy is new, no shit. Tbh, I mostly blame it on the archer, it's people like him/her that just make the game worse. People like the marauder need to be taught in a calm manner. Not in some demeaning 'I am better than you' insult filled comment. But still, at least you stayed mature in that situation, maybe not in this forum post however.

This ^

There's not really much of a point to this thread at all other than to vent some latent frustration with the issue. Sure we get that there are some out there who are unwilling to take constructive advice even when given in a very calm, polite, and subtle manner. I know as I've ran into more than my fair share of them as have others. But in all honesty the marauder is at least thinking creatively. In the role of someone who is the MT (which I would imagine was the case here) BFB isn't a very great idea for obvious reasons, but in the role of an OT it's a fairly decent idea in certain situations. For example in Titan HM through DF which needs two tanks to queue in the OT going in as a marauder utilizing more DPS abilities like BFB isn't a bad way of approaching the fight. In this case it would be best for them to go all out DPS as they're not going to need to worry about damage mitigation anyways (assuming the MT doesn't go down).

I think here concerning this issue we have someone who is thinking, but it just wasn't applied appropriately.