Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 82

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Nouran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    172
    Character
    Zait Zaitoon
    World
    Odin
    Main Class
    Dark Knight Lv 70
    the other guy in the party is making fun of him and calling him stupid and u ask him to not take it as an insult ?
    if i was him i would harassed, flamed, trolled the hell out of u both
    (4)
    =/

  2. #2
    Player
    Gormogon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    900
    Character
    Gormogon Maxwell
    World
    Faerie
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 60
    I remember those good ol days of classes. Was so fun then you hit 30 and everything changes.

    Yet I like how an Archer complains to a Marauder. He isn't even a Bard. If the Archer was a Bard he could've played the song of his people.
    (0)

  3. #3
    Player
    CrossSleet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    87
    Character
    Cross Tia
    World
    Zodiark
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 50
    I too think Archer and OP was at fault here.
    Of course used language wasnt needed but they could choose different words to advice him.
    + really...who cares much about low level dungeon? Anyone can tank sastasha. When i was playing with friends nobody was tankin and it was just fun. ''Elites'' are to rough nowadays... never tough you can be shitstormed at low level dungeons for using bad skills... its the same as Healers being mad for people who use cure on low level dungeons...but its just so fun.
    (1)

  4. #4
    Player
    OPneedNerfs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gridanian at heart
    Posts
    520
    Character
    Zyxt Fair
    World
    Tonberry
    Main Class
    Summoner Lv 90
    All these people who are in defense of the tank and flaming the OP, logic seems to bounce right off you people huh?

    The OP started off with a simple question of "Why are you using blood for blood? "

    If that in any way sounds offensive to you, don't bother replying, logic obviously bounces right off you.

    The OP was replied with a "why wouldn't I? It increases damage which increases enmity".

    The OP then tells the tank not to use that. Because gee, when the tank takes more damage, who has to take care of it? That's right, the healer. Who might that be in this case? OH RIGHT, THE OP.

    Now the reply immediately after the OP tells the TANK to stop using blood for blood because he's taking more damage from it, was a nice, short "you not to bright are you".

    For the slow ones, here's what a TANK is supposed to do.

    "Tanking" occurs when the unit is intended to be the one taking damage (typically by being dangerous or detrimental, or using a game mechanic that forces it to be targeted), and secondly, to ensure that they can survive this damage through sheer health points or mitigation.

    Sometimes I really wonder how people can make statements saying the OP was at fault even when:
    1. The names are censored.
    2. The facts are right there, even the way the sentences were worded.
    3. The tank obviously has no clue about his role and decided to be a smartass about it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Scarletyoshi View Post
    Archer complains about tank using non optimal skill, admits to playing sub par on purpose because he'd rather chat with his LS. Who are we supposed to sympathize with again?
    The poor healer(OP) who has to deal with all that shite.
    (9)
    Last edited by OPneedNerfs; 06-16-2014 at 03:46 AM.

  5. #5
    Player
    Scarletyoshi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    130
    Character
    Carmine Cavatina
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 50
    Archer complains about tank using non optimal skill, admits to playing sub par on purpose because he'd rather chat with his LS. Who are we supposed to sympathize with again?
    (10)

    "We're all different. But there's something kind of fantastic about that isn't there?"
    "I'm tired of being polite about something that matters so much" ~ Joss Whedon
    "The person who says that the only way to please them is to restrict options for others is, if you ask me, the onewho deserves it least." ~ David Gaider
    "Sorry for the inconvenience, we're trying to change the world." ~ The Protester

  6. #6
    Player
    RaquelleAvarosa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Aymeric's Bed
    Posts
    411
    Character
    Raquelle Rosalia
    World
    Tonberry
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 90
    I am assuming that the Marauder is relatively geared (i90), it shouldn't be a problem if he's taking 25% more damage as the mobs isn't that painful to him in the first place. WAR/MRD's ability to self-heal is pretty high. I don't see any issue why using Blood for Blood as a MRD is "wrong". I wouldn't say that a MRD/WAR's job is to DPS and not tank, but if the situation allows the MRD to dps and tank at the same, why not?
    (0)

  7. #7
    Player
    DkFusion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    104
    Character
    Nook Ni
    World
    Leviathan
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 90
    This is LOL. If I were the marauder I would have used blood for blood as well. BFB/Bloodbath/overpower. Maybe even some internal release. It's pre-30 so what's the problem. If the archer is already doing sub optimal dps who wants to be stuck in there any longer and a paladin could cure anything before 30. Hell most healers cleric stance and dps low level dungeons. The tank may be guilty for being a douche in the matter of defending use of the skill but to even make a remark about him using blood for blood is pretty ignorant. All topped with a yummy comment about T9. Hauuke Manor is not T9. Everything about end-game raiding referenced in relation to lvl 30ish dungeon is mind blowing when people are defending the OP with talk of the use of logic.
    (5)

  8. #8
    Player Alukah's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,475
    Character
    Alukah Bast
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Goldsmith Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by DkFusion View Post
    ---
    Hey now, it's not like I was forcing the marauder to follow my advice, I continued healing him until the moment he left.

    Why the level of the content matters for giving someone an advice? Or where is the ignorant part of giving advice to someone that may not know how a skill works? Also -again- he was the one who mentioned T9 when the archer was talking about blood for blood.

    I don't understand why some people advices like a personal insult.

    Quote Originally Posted by RaquelleAvarosa View Post
    I am assuming that the Marauder is relatively geared (i90), it shouldn't be a problem if he's taking 25% more damage as the mobs isn't that painful to him in the first place. WAR/MRD's ability to self-heal is pretty high. I don't see any issue why using Blood for Blood as a MRD is "wrong". I wouldn't say that a MRD/WAR's job is to DPS and not tank, but if the situation allows the MRD to dps and tank at the same, why not?
    It was a lvl 29 marauder, though not a newbie, only two classes left to get to 50.

    I always check people's search info when a dungeon starts to know if i should or not say special boss mechanics (like moving aiatar for new tanks).
    (1)
    Last edited by Alukah; 06-16-2014 at 04:49 AM.

  9. #9
    Player
    RaquelleAvarosa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Aymeric's Bed
    Posts
    411
    Character
    Raquelle Rosalia
    World
    Tonberry
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Alukah View Post
    -snip-
    I see. I'm still sticking to what I said "if the situation allows the MRD to dps and tank at the same, why not?"
    (1)

  10. #10
    Player
    Purrfectstorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    668
    Character
    Purrfect Storm
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Dragoon Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Alukah View Post
    I don't understand why some people advices like a personal insult.
    Because tone matters.

    Another thing to keep in mind is that in a competitive environment people tend to "act more certain than they feel". This quote is from the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. It's good reading, especially if you really DON'T understand why someone might act in a defensive manner when advice is given.

    One last point about advice: the tank was a random player, to them, the other party members are random players also. So why should the tank assume any of the other party members' advice is WORTH taking?

    On top of that, I happen to think that Blood For Blood from a MRD in a low level dungeon isn't that bad. When healers can DPS their way through it and tanks don't even need to use mitigation, Blood For Blood may be just fine.

    Here's my piece of advice, don't let yourself get so worked up about these things and let people play the way they want. Even well-meant advice often comes across as condescending in a game environment. Did the tank ask for any of your advice - "Why am I taking so much damage?" No.
    (2)

Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast