Protesting Frontlines

[zulu_kulu]

Don't mistake my intent. I'm not arguing against AP and for Morale here. I'm simply asking; Why is an AP advantage allowed, and a Morale one not? I'm not arguing we shouldn't have AP, but keep Morale, I'm simply wondering why one advantage is allowed and another not. It is a genuine question aside from the debate of Morale.

People who are against Morale, apparently in any form since they disagree with any suggestion that would adjust Morale, claim to be against it because it provides a level playing field. OK, I can understand that. The thing is though, a level playing field, by its very definition, should be level. How then, is a difference in AP being allowed? Why is nobody against AP? Why are you defending AP?

the reason why they defend AP , but shame morale is quite simple :they do not realize yet how truly important aps are. most players tries to max out their pvp skills before hitting their traits, but i assure once FL comes out, you will hear how "ap is "unbalanced" and needs to be either fully maxed out or restricted to base level in FL. see all these people who doesnt believe this clearly never maxed out their traits and used it in the 30/40 queues. go ahead guys and just do this, i assure you you will see the very clear and overwhelming advantage of AP.just today, i went on a winning streak in the 30s/40s ques just using my mnk,war (not mrd) and smn with just their main trait (on in the war case full str) maxed out and hot hell did the range dps and healer melted.if FL is truly supposed to be a "easy going everyone is equal" battlefield then AP do need to be fully maxed or restricted to base level. also materia need to be cancel out also due the fact you are getting a little bit more stats then everyone else. just make everything completely identical and equal and let skill alone be the determining factor.