NINJA and ROGUE confirmed

[Nalien]

And this is a strawman.

This is the correct way to rebuttal.
Argument: Rogue plays like Thief so there is no reason to bring in Thief.
The logical counter: Gladiator plays like Knight so there's no reason to bring in Knight.

Knight and Paladin are the exact same thing... In Japanese Paladin is called Knight, Paladin just came about on western shores with FFIVs localization for some reason, and it just stuck ever since. So... The "logical" counter, is exactly what I said? Thanks for backing me up there.

Case and point; Paladin adds nothing but the name, classic gear, and Cover to the game. The rest of its abilities are generic MMO ones. They still added it. Solely because the reason they added Jobs in the first place was to reintroduce classic Job names and gear to the game. Thief should be in the exact same boat as Paladin, yet people arguing that Paladin plays the same as Gladiator (because me and others are saying nobody brings Gladiator to endgame) are busy telling me that Thief cannot come off Rouge because it'll play the same as Rouge. It's hilariously stupid; "We cannot have this classic Job, because it will be the same as all the other classic Jobs they've added already".

So be careful what you wish for... :/

I don't wish for Thief, I wished for Ninja and got it. At the same time though, I'm not blind enough to discredit Thief for seemingly nonsensical reasons.