What happened to this announced feature?

[kaynide]

Might as well keep it together.

On topic though, I'm surprised this didn't become a thing. I and several friends have our own semi-private FCs with like..6-8 members. We each have our own FC houses and more or less function independently, but we do often gather together.

Such a system would allow members to do things/chat/etc together, but also allow for groups to break apart without it looking like a nightmare divorce.
..alternatively, a "Super FC" with the top leadership having access to their own vault/house and a more general house/vault setup for regular members. It just adds a lot of options.

[Fredco191]

I didn't even know this was planned to be a thing!




crazy

[Fawkes]

On topic though, I'm surprised this didn't become a thing. I and several friends have our own semi-private FCs with like..6-8 members. We each have our own FC houses and more or less function independently, but we do often gather together.

Such a system would allow members to do things/chat/etc together, but also allow for groups to break apart without it looking like a nightmare divorce.
..alternatively, a "Super FC" with the top leadership having access to their own vault/house and a more general house/vault setup for regular members. It just adds a lot of options.

You could argue that the development of this feature ultimately led to Fellowships.

[kaynide]

You could argue that the development of this feature ultimately led to Fellowships.

Could be- that would certainly be easier to implement, one would think. And would be entirely separate from whatever complicated code goes into FC permissions.