Adding a political system

[Dyne]

And another ad-hominem!

As much "good" as you are. You presented an idea. I pointed out the flaws and potential issues in that idea.

I realize you think "being useful" is basically "agreeing with your idea". However, that's not the way it works.

My criticisms have been very specific and consistent... Your idea is whimsical, not well thought out, not well planned, and you keep changing the way you're pitching it.

Perhaps if you were to take that away from the discussion, better think out the idea. Put it in a better and more clearly thought out format, even if only as an initial "pitch", like Amineri did... You'd have received a better reaction from it.

Instead, you get offended, get your panties in a wad, go into spin mode and start lashing out about it.

You didn't mention anything constructive, and by that I mean, what would you do differently? I'm asking you to imagine yourself in a leadership position, and you respond by saying "No! I don't wanna! That's stupid! No! Just No! No! *stumps foots around* No! It's stupid, stupid, stupid! You're Stupid and Lazy! No!" So if you cannot even do anything metaphorically, then what good are you?

[Preypacer]

You didn't mention anything constructive, and by that I mean, what would you do differently? I'm asking you to imagine yourself in a leadership position,

Because what you consider "constructive" basically means "agree with Dyne's idea in the first place..."... and I don't.

I believe I've already covered this and explained why, in detail, going back some pages now. If you didn't read, or chose to ignore, those reasons... that's not my problem. I'm not going to continue repeating myself for someone who insists on remaining willfully ignorant and refuses to read or comprehend anything except what they want to hear/read.

and you respond by saying "No! I don't wanna! That's stupid! No! Just No! No! *stumps foots around* No! It's stupid, stupid, stupid! You're Stupid and Lazy! No!" So if you cannot even do anything metaphorically, then what good are you?

That's a wonderful characterization of exactly what I'm not doing.

I'm disagreeing with your idea. I'm challenging you to provide better reasoned supporting arguments for it. I'm poking fun at how inconsistent you've been in pitching it throughout this thread. I'm calling you out on being lazy in your presentation of the idea, because it is.

I am not, however, stomping feet or throwing a tantrum.

Nice go at mischaracterizing and revising history though.