No, no i did not. He even got his static buddy to come back him up. (Noted below.)
They stack two blms instead of using a variety of jobs.
BLM is a job where its very easy to push high numbers. BLM is different from monk (which also got a buff) that doesnt require to use something like Greased Lightning (which is similar to war's wrath stacks. Meaning it requires having completed combos.)
The game is intended for use of different jobs. Their static is using two blms' thus they are asking for a blm buff.
They clearly want their 2 static BLMs to be buffed to push higher numbers in turn 9 so they can clear it faster/easier.
I play all 9 jobs. Its absolutely ridiculous to have them be more and more alike, that defeats the purpose of them being different. Go back and re read the OP. Its about the jobs being different, not stacking the same job (which is what you stated youre doing.)
So let me put it like this.
You play the game for gear and endgame.
I play for variety and endgame. (Meaning while I do clear coil, turn 6+ i also like to do other things, such as craft, or gear and play all the other jobs.)
So of course you wont find it ridiculous that youre basically asking for blm to deal more single target damage, kin to a monk. Monk specializes in combos and single target. BLM specializes in AoE, and critical hits. They are different.
When you ask for them to become even more slightly similar that takes the fun out of doing more than just endgame..
I have all 9 jobs geared to i91+ so i can enjoy the games variety.
I understand that some people only play for endgame but, maybe try not asking them to buff jobs because you want to clear content faster so you can clear quick and then wait for reset then complain that youre bored cause youre locked out of endgame.
Damn SE to hell for asking BLM's to manage when and how they deal their massive numbers (sarcasm.) (BLM gets quite a lot of instant casts via Thunder and Fire spells. They also have DoT and an instant cast spell, and swiftfast. Is it so hard to change a spell rotation for a fight? No.)