Results 1 to 10 of 449

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Mithra Mog-house Interloper
    Posts
    467
    Quote Originally Posted by Betelgeuzah View Post
    Ah, GW2 isn't F2P? It uses the same model.

    I don't even know why you brought up GW1, cause I sure as hell didn't.

    It's buy to play, by the way..
    You said they had no payment model assuming that the game would do bad based on that aspect. I brought up GW1, the same company that does GW2, pointing out that the game did extremely well in that aspect despite it being F2P.

    C'mon it's not that hard to stay on the ball with this convo guy. I shouldn't have to draw you a picture with crayons.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    Betelgeuzah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    3,083
    Character
    Captain Lalafist
    World
    Odin
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 82
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    You said they had no payment model assuming that the game would do bad based on that aspect.
    You are replying to too many people at once.

    You responded to a guy talking about catering to both casuals and hardcores, saying GW2 is the answer.

    I said that doesn't make even a sliver of sense (it doesn't).

    Nowhere did I say GW2 would do badly because it's B2P. I think it's going to perform exceptionally well for what it is, just like GW1.

    Not being able t cater to both audiences has nothing to do with it's success.
    (1)

  3. #3
    Player
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Mithra Mog-house Interloper
    Posts
    467
    Quote Originally Posted by Betelgeuzah View Post
    You are replying to too many people at once.

    You responded to a guy talking about catering to both casuals and hardcores, saying GW2 is the answer.

    I said that doesn't make even a sliver of sense (it doesn't).

    Nowhere did I say GW2 would do badly because it's B2P. I think it's going to perform exceptionally well for what it is, just like GW1.

    Not being able t cater to both audiences has nothing to do with it's success.
    Pretty sure you said this

    Oh, is that what the (PR) developers said? How cute.

    Regardless, it doesn't make a sliver of sense considering their subscription model (or the lack of it).

    On top of being impossible to accomplish.
    (0)