Locations we are still waiting for

[Lhasya]

The entry for Thavnairian Mistletoe still states that Radz-at-Han is the captial of the Thavnairian country as of yesterdayish when I looked it up for roleplay purposes.

Would you like a screenshot/is that something you already caught? I'm afraid I haven't seen the thread in question.

[Ruri]

Any dungeon that requires 2 groups of 4 and they have to split up and communicate to get through traps. Like where 1 party needs to do certain things for the other party to advance, (Cutter's Cry 1.0 kind of). The parties battle mini bosses on their own then meet up at the end for the final boss.

[Kyan]

The entry for Thavnairian Mistletoe still states that Radz-at-Han is the captial of the Thavnairian country as of yesterdayish when I looked it up for roleplay purposes.

Would you like a screenshot/is that something you already caught? I'm afraid I haven't seen the thread in question.

No, that's fine! Here is the localisation thread I made.

We had a lot of confusion about the state of Radz-at-Han and Thavnair. The response we got was that, Radz-at-Han claims dominion over Thavnair, much like how Ul'dah claims dominion over Thanalan, Limsa Lominsa over Vylbrand/La Noscea, and Gridania over the Black Shroud (which seems logical, however the terms of "capital" and "city-state" were both being used).

So, Thavnair is the name of the island, land, region - Radz-at-Han is the city state that claims that land as its own. There are likely smaller settlements on the island, like how Thanalan has the Golden Bazaar, Silver Bazaar, Vesper Bay, etc.

I agree that the descriptions are still confusing - so I would suggest either added to that thread your thoughts, with a copy and paste of the item descriptions (or screenshots!) as the Localisation people often review these posts right before an update.

However, I think they are "technically correct" at this stage

[Lhasya]

I see, I see! So yeah, calling Thavnair a 'country' is a bit misleading, yes, but not as incorrect as I'd thought it was. Thank you for the clarification!

Man, what we really need is a setting and lore book. Just a big ol' book, full of worldbuilding. I'd buy it. Twice, maybe.