Essentially, by the sound of it, there are two things here.
Primals are Elemental based beings, each of the Beastmen's Primal attributes itself to a specific Element - Fire, Wind, Earth, Water (eventually Lightning, Ice). The Primals also do not look like their Beastmen, not truly. While Ifrit is lizard'ish, he is thinner, elongated, more demonic in a respect than Amalj'aa, Titan is a hulking earth-composed beast, Garuda has feathers, but the Ixali actually, do not. Leviathan does have scales/fins, which the Sahagan do have, but is still more of a serpent than a humanoid creature, as Garuda and Titan are.
Mog King, however, looks exactly like the Moogles themselves. It represents them as their Primal because their wish is one of their own kinship to be their salvation.
Why do the Elemental Primals take on their respective forms? No idea.
Which leads me to also believe that if/when the Dragons are revealed to have a Primal as well, I sincerely doubt it'll be Bahamut, as it would be too similar, granted Bahamut has also always been attributed to being non-elemental, so perhaps that would still work.
Going along this same thought - I could see them going as far as having Ishgard summon something akin to the Knights of the Round at some point, non-elemental, representing themselves in a sense, in a sense still Holy or simply righteous. That fight, if it ever happened, would make the Mog King fight look like cake. lol
While I won't go into details, because I don't know who else gleans information from external sites, but a recent discovery was found in the files from 2.2 that showed what is likely a new beastmen tribe coming in the future. Which, if they are attuned to say, Shiva for instance, do not look like her - at all -. Which furthers the point that Elemental Primals are not represented by their worshippers, but are instead given a form which they themselves favor instead. Why exactly, who can say, except the lore masters themselves.
Your original question, regarding whether the Primals we face now, are truly the Primals, or simply representing them is still plausible. While the naming is different, it can also go back to the way the names were used in XI. Avatars. An Avatar of a deity is not the deity itself, but a projection of its astral self into the physical world. Lessened, considerably, from it's true power because if a deity actually stepped down on the same world as mortals, it would likely have disastrous repercussions. Likewise, these Primals, may simply be Avatars of their true selves, sustained by the power of aether/crystals/blood sacrifice, but still not their actual selves. To fight the actual Primal itself, at its own "full power", would likely require going into a semi incorporeal space. I think of it as a divide, the corporal/material world we're in, then the incorporeal/aetherial world that permeates through our own, giving sustenance to the land, the air, but also the means that Primals have of emerging into our own world, while still remaining outside of it. Which can be partly why they are able to be returned so often, until their actual cores are disrupted, they can return again, granted each time requires more and more power to do so.
Also consider, essentially all 'aethereal' is, is 'ethereal'. As the word 'aethereal' does not get used anymore. So the idea that they would use similar concepts of a prime material (physical world) and ethereal (spiritual world) is not far fetched. It may also lend to the fact that the reason they chose Primal, as the choice title to these beings, is because they are taking a physical form of themselves from the Aether, but it does not mean it is themselves, fully.


Reply With Quote







