Quote Originally Posted by Daenerys_Sedai View Post
While dissimilar in implementation, the abuse still operates the same in that: you have a group of say 5 FC members who want an individual member to get loot. Whether it's a vote to allow that member to change to said job or to kick someone they don't want getting the loot, they still hold the majority.
That's not to say that there isn't a solution or workaround, but as we know, solutions usually come after the abuse has run for a few weeks
The only scenario I can think of would be if I volunteer to switch say, from dps to tank/healer, they say no, and a 6th member from the FC gets in as the role I was denied. How is this an issue? I would think that players would be less likely to be upset in this situation since they are completing the content on the job they originally wanted to. I fail to see how a group could use this to monopolize loot drops, especially when taking the suggested rules of implementation into account.

Would love to see some examples, since that would be the best way to be proactive about potential solutions.