I'm not analyzing you. I'm deconstructing your arguments based on the premise that though they sound good, they really aren't.

You implied I didn't understand your analogies which wasn't true. But it doesn't suddenly give your arguments more weight either.

You could have stopped at saying you were in favor of an increasing level cap and been done with it, but then you insisted on using weak arguments to promote it. And when I pointed out that your arguments were weak you bluffed up and said apparently I don't understand what you are saying.

I'm not aiming to sound intellectual, I'm just debating my opinion. In this case it involves showing the weaknesses in opposing arguments. That's part of how a debate works.

If that makes me a tit, so be it.