German Com rep response to "reservation system for dungeons".

[Dreadnought]

Yes. The problem is definitely SE's "wording." You're totally right to blame them. If you -- with your superior writing skills -- had done the post, you'd have made it clear they were talking about instanced content. Which they didn't do, right? I mean, just look at what they said:Wait, isn't that exactly what you quoted? And doesn't it use the word "instance" right there in the sentence?

Hmm. Maybe SE's not to blame for your posts, after all.Awesome. I love how you deny, deny, deny that they're using instances, and then say that you expected that they'd use instances. Yeah. You knew it all along.

And if you think instance dungeons are "quirky technology," then I'm still not convinced you know what "instance" means. For example, it doesn't mean that they "create[d] several of the same zone with multiple rout[e]s." It means that they created one zone, and they run it on multiple instances.

k first off i was being sarcastic because i felt stupid for not getting what they said in the first place. sarcasm can be hard to get online so im not mad that it wasnt caught on.
second, let me show you this-
"since they use their own quirky *technology and do things differently than i *would it really wasnt surprising to me that *theyd just create several of the same zone with multiple routs and just call it an instance"

* the quirky technology im talking about is their hardware and software which have been noted by several people to not be optimized for creating an MMO, if those people were wrong and everything their side is great then... woops? either way i know im right in this aspect so ague it all you want.
edit, oh wait what i mean here is, i know im right because things would have been alot easier if they just went with at least the cry engine... or something with instructions.

* there are many things lots of us would have done differently than they

* what i said was (which i MEANT prior to this thread), i was expecting them to create a set number of the same zone awaiting occupancy- which are not instances. this and my poor understanding of their wording led me to think there were going to be multiple parties in one "instance". i use quotes here because i was expecting them to label these ever existing zones falsely as instances.
at what point did i deny they are using instances and then say i expected them to all along?

the last part of my sentence was referring to me expecting them to falsely call what they are creating instances. that was my expectation prior to me realizing they actually are using legitimate instances---- so one of my original questions still stands, how many at once?
wow, you non the less misunderstood what i said just as i them.