Results 11 to 18 of 18

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Player OrganizationXIll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    285
    Character
    Soraxas Straeh
    World
    Goblin
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 50

    No <mo> Equivalent for Console Players?

    EDIT: Found a work around. Still wish we could have a <ht> tag, but this enables me to do what I want.

    Quote Originally Posted by sbchikara View Post
    I was on the PS4 beta this weekend and decided to do my macros from new and try to do the macro your talking about, By doing the macro the other way round i was able to heal me and my pet separately with the one macro, I tried it in Crystal Tower and seemed to work there also. I don't know if this only works on PS4 as i haven't tested it on PS3 but it may be worth a try. It was something like this:

    /macroicon "Physick"
    /ac "Physick" <t>
    /ac "Embrace" <t>
    Quote Originally Posted by Bixby View Post
    Individual macro lines have the same effect as raw abilities cast on their end targets. When you cast one of your own spells (e.g. Physick) on your highlighted target, you lose the highlight and go back to your selected target. This doesn't happen with pet abilities. So when you have Physick as the first line, it casts on your highlighted target, then drops the highlight, leaving Embrace to cast on your selected target. When you have Embrace as the first line, it casts Embrace on the highlighted target, but doesn't drop the highlight, so Physick casts on the still highlighted target.
    --------------------------------------------------------------

    I was trying to use the embrace macro on my PS3 last night and realized <mo> didn't work. Then, after thinking about it, I realized it shouldn't because I don't use a mouse. However, after researching it, console players don't have one. :O The macro I was trying to use was:

    /micon "Physick"
    /pac "Embrace" <mo>
    /pac "Embrace" <t>
    /ac "Physick" <t>

    Every time I used the macro it would just Physick and Embrace the same target and give me the <mo> isn't a target error. So why can't we have an equivalent tag? We don't mouse over anything, but we move our highlighted selector up and down without pressing 'x'.

    Why can't there be a <ht> tag for 'highlighted target'..?

    Example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSVK8LpHoi8&t=24m35s

    It if you don't use <ht> it could default to target to keep it the way it works now. Just add that if <ht> is used you can use your <ht> and your <t> as 2 different targets for macro purposes.
    (1)
    Last edited by OrganizationXIll; 04-09-2014 at 01:35 AM.