Results 1 to 10 of 19

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    chocomaid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    426
    Character
    Temis Altera
    World
    Odin
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 50
    I see no problems with it, there are no rules stating that Party Finder is solely for doing dungeons. It is there for people to group together and find ways to interact together without the need of an almighty RNG based system that is Duty finder. The crafter is simply using resources that is available to him, he is actually making effort to be heard in a way.

    The only thing I got from this is you don't like a long list.

    I see it often and it doesn't bother me one bit, I simply scroll down and continue to play.
    (19)

  2. #2
    Player
    Welsper59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,427
    Character
    Eros Maxima
    World
    Leviathan
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by chocomaid View Post
    I see no problems with it, there are no rules stating that Party Finder is solely for doing dungeons. It is there for people to group together and find ways to interact together without the need of an almighty RNG based system that is Duty finder. The crafter is simply using resources that is available to him, he is actually making effort to be heard in a way.

    The only thing I got from this is you don't like a long list.

    I see it often and it doesn't bother me one bit, I simply scroll down and continue to play.
    I think SE figured people would understand that the name itself is implication enough of the use. There really shouldn't be a need for them to explicitly say what something called "Party Finder" is meant for, especially when you consider the options for activities you have available to select. Advertisement of services for things that are not part of the feature itself is misuse, harmless or not. At that point, it becomes a question of how abused (and disruptive) it becomes to determine whether or not GMs/SE need to step in. Imagine RMT spamming the party finder lol. They'd simply be using the resources available to them afterall. Yeah, you could filter, but I don't think anyone wants things to get to that point. A few people advertising things isn't a problem at all, and I doubt SE will do anything. But if it gets out of hand... you can bet that they'll have to step in. I doubt legit players would end up getting things to that point though.
    (3)

  3. #3
    Player
    darkstarpoet1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    3,305
    Character
    Darkstar Poet
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Carpenter Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Welsper59 View Post
    I think SE figured people would understand that the name itself is implication enough of the use. There really shouldn't be a need for them to explicitly say what something called "Party Finder" is meant for, especially when you consider the options for activities you have available to select. Advertisement of services for things that are not part of the feature itself is misuse, harmless or not. At that point, it becomes a question of how abused (and disruptive) it becomes to determine whether or not GMs/SE need to step in. Imagine RMT spamming the party finder lol. They'd simply be using the resources available to them afterall. Yeah, you could filter, but I don't think anyone wants things to get to that point. A few people advertising things isn't a problem at all, and I doubt SE will do anything. But if it gets out of hand... you can bet that they'll have to step in. I doubt legit players would end up getting things to that point though.
    completely ignorant to compare the 2. 1 is a player actually playing the game and going about doing things the right way and the other is breaking tos selling gil for real money. one is a bannable offense and the other is not.

    Quote Originally Posted by YmirEsc View Post
    rmts are not using it
    it is not an issue
    agreed completely.

    also add in that if rmt's were using it then it would be bannable in the first place as even them sending tells is bannable because rmt's are against the tos. it's not even worth it to compare the 2 since one is legit and the other isn't.
    (0)
    Last edited by darkstarpoet1; 04-05-2014 at 11:17 AM.