Regarding yet again... more nerfs.

[Tupsi]

Since you've completed this content then I wonder why you're so worried about it being made easier for others.

Who said I was worried? My comment was referring to the 2.1 items in terms of accomplishments - You simply spun my comment to fit your argument, then turned it into personal attacks, which quite frankly can get you banned for.

And please, spare me the faux-altruistic "let others experience it the way it was originally"

And still adding words to my post that never existed to fit your argument.

It's nerfed because there are many players, likely the majority, who haven't and never will beat, say, Titan HM and locking them out of the game from that point forever is bad business, if nothing else.

It's not bad business when you can look around and see how many relics exist, which btw, outweighs how many who can't beat titan HM - So SE isn't going to go bankrupt because a portion of players can't beat an easy boss fight, as you're assuming.

[IgnisFatuus]

So SE isn't going to go bankrupt because a portion of players can't beat an easy boss fight, as you're assuming.

people getting bored and frustrated over equipment that will soon be even more outdated will make them bankrupt. what's the alternative? selling runs, getting carried by your fc? i think it's better to just go through the content and get used to mechanics with some buffs then just get it handed to you or quit the game altogether.

[KraggyKor]

And still adding words to my post that never existed to fit your argument.

Nope, I didn't say that you said it and anyone reading your post can see .. I was simply suggesting you didn't waste your time replying like that if that was your intent.

It's not bad business when you can look around and see how many relics exist, which btw, outweighs how many who can't beat titan HM

The number of Relics in existence is irrelevant, the number of characters is .. in any case I doubt you have the numbers to even prove your asserted 'fact'.

ITP: We take someone else's post and spin it to fit our argument. I would wager you'd be a pretty good politician or lawyer.

Since you chose not to quote what I posted to which this cute little epithet applies I can only observe that yes, I probably could, because I'm good at seeing the logical fallacies paraded as 'facts' so often posted in web forums.