SE - Reverse these 3 things about Glamours QUICK

[Lemon8or]

1) At this point of the game, getting to 50 on a single class is not considered blitzing anymore. They still have time to go through quests and get their first 50 easily.
2) I'm sure it has more to do with the programming of the system. I imagine in their character database when you have the multi-slot items on, the other slots are specified as N/A (Not Available). Thus, an associated Glamour properties can't be linked to something that is not defined.
Bonus: I don't really mind. :/

[Erendis]

I definitely would have liked to glamourise my sugarloaf hat, since I was stuck with it forever >.<

[LunarEmerald]

50 is fine. Glamour is meant to be a special system. Having it at 50 essentially means you're forced to beat the game while experiencing the normal appearance of everything. Gotta make the newbs suffer with the subligar like the rest of us had to.

[Gesser]

Yes but since the gear is required to be usable by the base-class... even if a player has let's say a single 50 MNK... they won't be able to glamourize their WHM or WAR or BRD in any of the gear they want to see themselves in until those classes are ALSO 50.

Besides, my point more leans on the last minute notice.

Yeah, people are misunderstanding the word Glamour and it's terminology in the fantasy setting in which spells exist. We know that spells do not exist in real life so it's original meaning was altered a bit. But back in the days of believing in witches and witchcraft it was something else.

People are also clearly misunderstanding the word Mirage... especially with how it relates to prisms or crystals...

[Ecks007]

People are also clearly misunderstanding the word Mirage... especially with how it relates to prisms or crystals...

No I believe you are misunderstanding the word Mirage.

mi·rage
noun \mə-ˈräzh\

: something (such as a pool of water in the middle of a desert) that is seen and appears to be real but that is not actually there

: something that you hope for or want but that is not possible or real

The Glamour system changes the look of an item, but that item is still quite there and real.

[Gesser]

No I believe you are misunderstanding the word Mirage.

The Glamour system changes the look of an item, but that item is still quite there and real.

Look up the definition of Mirage & tell me I'm wrong again... if you want, you can look back a couple pages & see I clearly spelled out how it's an appropriate fit.

Quick SE, drop everything you are doing and reprogram this feature before next week!!!!!!1!!

I don't see an honest issue with #1. I was never forced into something I didn't like at any level which didn't have an alternative somewhere.

#2 is something I am sure will come in time. It's not like this is immutable. They are giving us the basics first, and will expand as they have time. Just like almost everything else they have done.

#3 I have to laugh at. In what world is "Mirage Prism" more masculine that "Glamour?" It's one scepter away from being a Magic Girl transformation.

Because Mirage doesn't have the same connotation "Glamorous" does in a Western Society...

[Kimbot]

Hmmmm, complaining about the name. Great......

[Arkghyom]

#2- Supported!

[Balfreid]

Why should it be anything but level 50? Give more content to the already level 50 players. People below level 50 are already busy trying to level up.

And no multi-slot... I am quite glad you can't because then every damn Warrior and Paladin will be dressed as Odin.

[Gesser]

Why should it be anything but level 50? Give more content to the already level 50 players. People below level 50 are already busy trying to level up.

And no multi-slot... I am quite glad you can't because then every damn Warrior and Paladin will be dressed as Odin.

You misunderstand. There is one-slot->multi-slot (e.g. Odin) which is NOT possible & multi-slot->one-slot (e.g. Hooded Robe to Unhooded Robe) which IS possible, however you can't then equip a head-slot.