Observations on DPS in End Game

[skaterger]

I recall trying to research my class on the internet and I realized that there were a lot of conflicting opinions on how to optimize one's dps as well as out of date documents. It isn't like trying to research a rotation for World of Warcraft where it was very easy to find a good guide simply because of the game's massive popularity. MMOs aren't quite like that anymore.

They should really not be trying to create rotations in this day and age. I'm all for having a variety of abilities that do different things, but the dps choices should be very obvious.

I can't really agree with this sort of mindset. May I know what class you were researching with that had many conflicting opinions on their rotation? Afaik, all 5 dps classes are fairly consistent in their rotations, with the possible exception of monk having side-only, back-only or side-back movement dps. But even so, the rotations have a few governing principles that all non-mmo newbies should possess

1) Keeping uptime on dots and debuffs on enemy as much as possible
2) Using offensive cooldowns as much as possible and as soon as its off cooldown
2) Weaving off gcd cooldowns into your normal 2.5 sec gcd rotations
3) Correct positioning during skills and right order of skills used to maximize damage

In cases like whether fracture are useful for dragoon or whether to open with thunder 2 or 3 with blm, yes there are many opinions on this but you need to realize that these are the players who min max and its not going to affect your dps by a significant amount whether you choose to use it or not. People who are doing sub dps as OP is talking about usually have much more major problems like spamming full thrust or casting blizzard for 90% of the fight to conserve mana.

I think a large part of what keeps a game interesting is that there are still certain unknowns or variables in the game. This keeps players interested and discussions alive as to the optimum rotations, skill tree, gear choices etc. If there is only 1 build or a cookie cutter build, then everything becomes homogenized and becomes nothing more than everyone mindlessly button mashing. This was what led me to leaving some other games and I personally do not hope SE goes down this route.

[illuminapanic]

I can't really agree with this sort of mindset. May I know what class you were researching with that had many conflicting opinions on their rotation? Afaik, all 5 dps classes are fairly consistent in their rotations, with the possible exception of monk having side-only, back-only or side-back movement dps. But even so, the rotations have a few governing principles that all non-mmo newbies should possess

1) Keeping uptime on dots and debuffs on enemy as much as possible
2) Using offensive cooldowns as much as possible and as soon as its off cooldown
2) Weaving off gcd cooldowns into your normal 2.5 sec gcd rotations
3) Correct positioning during skills and right order of skills used to maximize damage

I agree with this person. I like to believe that I am an above average player on most of my classes and all I had to do was come to the dps section on the forums to look up people's tips/advice on certain classes. They really aren't hard to find at all and a lot of skilled players give their input, with proven data, on what to adjust which is then edited on the main threads.

People who are doing sub dps as OP is talking about usually have much more major problems like spamming full thrust or casting blizzard for 90% of the fight to conserve mana.

It's funny because I joined a DF Titan HM as my War one time and we never got past heart phase. I was trying to eyeball the situation as to see what was wrong and I noticed that our Smn was not only eating every single avoidable damage, but he only casting ruin1. He didn't have his pet out and didn't cast any dots. Although he may not be the sole factor of us not progressing past heart, he was a major factor of the failure.

[skaterger]

I think a distinction between playing to a class's optimal potential and playing to an individual's skill cap
potential needs to be made here. While I would strongly agree that it would behoove every player to play to the best of his/her ability, it would be impossible to accurately ascertain someone's potential (especially strangers from df or pf).

For every player that finds keeping several dots and debuffs with 100% uptime, using all offensive cooldowns the second it's off cooldown, weaving in off gcd skills between gcds while simultaneously maintaining optimal positioning and avoiding all the crap on the ground child's play, I assure you there will be others who find it physically impossible to do so. This can be due to any number of reasons the previous poster mentioned (reflexes, brain lag, latency, rl distractions etc).

It's akin to telling you to learn to play an fps correctly, which means headshotting 100% of the time. If you can't you're bad.

tldr If a random dps does not live up to your "standards", but is trying his hardest and done all he could (read rotations, practice on dummy) How will you label him then?

[bokchoykn]

tldr If a random dps does not live up to your "standards", but is trying his hardest and done all he could (read rotations, practice on dummy) How will you label him then?

If the effort is there, I respect that. Even if the effort is not there (because not everyone cares about being skilled at this video game) I even respect that too. I don't expect all players to be pros. Some will never be good enough to defeat Titan HM without a carry, etc... That's perfectly fine.

The entire point of the post is that the road to improvement, for the ones who wish to travel it, has many barriers set by the nature of the game and the ignorance of the community.

• The importance of DPS output is underrated, even by DD themselves, thus reducing players' incentive from improving this facet of their play.
  
• Without third party parsers, the game does very little to facilitate the improvement of DPS output.
  
• DDs are not held to the same standard as Tanks or Healers, further reducing their incentive to improve.

My intended message is to break these barriers by:

• Understanding and acknowledging the importance of DPS and incorporating it into your play.
  
• Utilizing the available tools that can facilitate the improvement of DPS, and do it in such a way that won't risk getting you banned.
  
• Holding yourself and your teammates to a higher standard, regardless of role. In a constructive way, of course.

[skaterger]

I still don't see how dps are not accountable for fights when Titan heart phase, ifrit ex nails, T4, T5 are all hard dps checks. If a raid wipes to any of the above mechanics, the fingers will be solely pointed to the dps. Maybe its not as obvious as a tank losing aggro or a healer not healing, but the collective dps has failed as a whole. And isn't there a saying like "you are only as good as your weakest member" or something like that.

I can kinda see where you are going with parsers, but the fact is most of the player community has not progressed to a point where parsers are necessary imho. Do you really think you need a parser for wp, ak ct or any of the hm dungeons? If SE decides to include parsers as a feature in the game, its just going to grief more players than it benefits. And serious raiders who are challenging end game content are going to get parsers one way or another, regardless of whether its allowed by SE or not.

[Viridiana]

I still don't see how dps are not accountable for fights when Titan heart phase, ifrit ex nails, T4, T5 are all hard dps checks. If a raid wipes to any of the above mechanics, the fingers will be solely pointed to the dps. Maybe its not as obvious as a tank losing aggro or a healer not healing, but the collective dps has failed as a whole. And isn't there a saying like "you are only as good as your weakest member" or something like that.

I can kinda see where you are going with parsers, but the fact is most of the player community has not progressed to a point where parsers are necessary imho. Do you really think you need a parser for wp, ak ct or any of the hm dungeons? If SE decides to include parsers as a feature in the game, its just going to grief more players than it benefits. And serious raiders who are challenging end game content are going to get parsers one way or another, regardless of whether its allowed by SE or not.

Except that I could fail Titan heart phase over and over again. Without a parser, I'm not going to be able to see who's playing sub-par and causing the group to fail. You can say that the group is only as good as its weakest member, but how fair is it to then deny the group one of the primary tools they can use to improve themselves?

As far as needing it for AK. . .I've seen some pretty poor dps in there. Fights where we wiped to the first boss because DPS couldn't kill the golems fast enough to even really damage the boss itself. Fights where the Wall just pushes us inexorably toward the back of the room. Fights where we finish as a fifth Catastrophe is being cast. These are all times that I would've loved to be able to tell the DPS what they were doing wrong, but it's somewhat beyond my ability to catch everything that my teammates are doing while simultaneously running all over the arena contending with mechanics.

And honestly, the idea that people don't need parsers purely because they're still on easy content seems odd to me. The easy content should be building you toward the harder content, in the same way that leveling up builds you to the level 50 content. Letting people get by with lousy rotations and having no tool to correct them with just means that when they get to difficult content they have to forget everything they know about their class and completely relearn it. I don't know about you, but I'd rather learn BLM in WP where I won't often have to move than learn it while also trying to learn Titan Extreme. . .

[skaterger]

snip

Back when I played Wow, someone in the raid would post dmg done/dps from recount into raid chat. After the raid, officers would also briefly analyze different parameters (dmg taken, number of times a particular skill is used etc) for boss fights and if someone wasn't performing up to expectations, they would pm them to have a chat about it. This is what I call constructive use of parsers. If SE can incorporate something like this into ffxiv I would be totally receptive of it as it would help fcs and statics so much for progression fights.

This is all well and good within the context of a grp of people playing together regularly but what if used in DF and PF which do you think would be the more likely scenario?

1) Point out to the newbie the inaccuracies in his rotation and help him overcome it
2) Humiliate him, kick him out of party or leave party?

My point being, if its a straight up dps check and who isn't pulling their weight, its not hard to tell at all. The threat meter, while not 100% accurate can be used as a rough gauge.

Now imagine this expended to the duty finder in CT where there are 24 players. People were already abusing the ready check and vote abandon system? Can you imagine the fiasco if a parser was introduced?

[skaterger]

Trim

I can agree with you on this definitely. The 2.5 sec gcd definitely trivializes the game somewhat. Maybe the rotation that I described is what I do personally, or at least what I strive to do. But still from what the op seems to be describing, it seems to be a fairly high level of play (selling ex primal runs) I reckon at least has to have every player at 85-90% of the class potential. And even though I don't have a lvl 50 dragoon yet, I believe it is not as simple as just HT, ID and Dis, to really max dps you need to time all your buffs with bfb and IR (power surge, life surge, plem, leg sweep, inv, jumps in that 20 sec window). I had to work it out at the start but now it becomes second nature for me. All I'm saying is that it might not work that way for everybody.

Let me give you an example from Wow (since I only started ff14 a month ago and played wow >5 yrs). There was this female healer in my guild who played a holy priest and the husband played a tank. We raided 10 man from BC to cata and for the most part of her journey as a healer, she was a terrible healer. She literally could not multitask. (If she had to move she could not heal, if she had to heal she could not move,she would always forget to heal the tank, shield the tank use cooldowns and basically have tunnel vision healing.) We tried every ways and means to help her and even had a gathering where we watched her play and told her what to do while we watched. She just could not heal to save her life but you could see she was really trying. I would imagine she would die a gruesome death if she tried titan hm in ffxiv. This is what I am saying. Not everyone has the same skill cap and it is arguably unfair to generalize everyone that does not meet your defined standard as bad when you have no idea of their background or playstyle.

And if you think blm can't screw up, obviously you have not played blm enough. I can't count the number of times I was 5 mana short of a swiftcast flare or 10 mana short of a blizzard 3 and I stand there looking like an idiot waiting for a transpose tick. Or maybe Im just "Bad" :P

[bokchoykn]

snip

I didn't say that using parsers to compete with each other is a bad thing. I do it all the time. It's fun taunting your friend when you outparse him, and being taunted when he outparses you. It's fun and it drives you to do better.

I was only making a point that some people dislike parsers because they think its only purpose to to create a DPS contest. They don't see the other purposes and benefits of parsers and that's why they think they're pointless.

The rest of your post accurately describes what I'm trying to say. Thank you!

[Rein-Yagami]

I'm sorry but you sound like a really mad person. While I don't agree 100% with the OP, I think you both are misinterpreting each other but you are just being a dick about it.

Yup, I actually tempered my original first response to this thread quite a bit~ it was their decision to equate "ability to do x/y/z" with "the game doesn't give a fuck, why should I? I'll be an elitist bitch" that pissed me off sufficiently to no longer care how I came across~