

 
			
			
				Right, so leave it up to the group to vote (I mean actually vote, like kicking a member, not "I say yes").
Exactly this. I trust myself, a Few FC mates. And I'm all in for slower fights, as I hate Speed runs.it's not a penalty if the system supports it.
my SCH and BRD are both i100+ both have i110 necklaces. i would like to get a Mog necklace for my BLM, why do you want to gimp the party and make me come on BLM? why do you want the party to do less DPS, why do you want to invite a random healer that can't Esuna/Leech properly?
why would you not support a system that lets us win 6/6 and get 6 drops and instead prefer going 4/4 with slower fights or go 3/8 and get less items?
it's an odds game, trust 1 person vs trusting 7.
Your point of gimping is true to that extent though. That's why I'll say it again: if you get into one instance with everyone that you know, then agree on loot, no point for the masterloot system, cause everyone will play 'fair'.
So you want that loot for BLM? Sure, if I'm with you and all agree, it's yours to take if it drops ^^
As OP mentionned, if it's something like an option and SE agrees, all good.
So far, with issues already in the game, I see no point bringing another system that might confuse some people even after reading it and still rage/report/make trouble.
Everyone knows you have to dodge at Titan. Everyone knows the rules.. yet..
Everyone knows you can't use 3rd app, buying Gil or bot system.. yet.. (you can trust Humans to play fair lol)
Giving power to one human behind a keyboard, unless all agree, and he goes into a powertrip, like a Judge in real life that had a bad day cause his wife didn't give him what he wanted.. I wish you won't be judged at his court on the same day
With many years of gaming, I'm in the same boat, so thank you.This is a system with the potential to be abused like crazy, and I've seen it abused like crazy many times before. Things are fine the way they are, and a heck of a lot better than they could be if they implemented something like this. No changes are needed or necessary. Seriously man, you have no idea the sheer amount of whining and drama you would unleash upon Eorzea if this change were to be made to the game. Take it from someone who has run endgaming guilds in other games. Things are far better off the way they are.
Last edited by KingOfAbyss; 08-29-2014 at 02:32 AM.
It doesn't solve the issue of a party of 3 voting against 1 person in party finder or a party of 5 voting against a party of 3 in CT or ST.
A FC also should not be voting to have Master loot either.
|  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
 
			 Originally Posted by Xystic
 Originally Posted by Xystic
					
 Reply With Quote
  Reply With Quote 
			
 
			