Let's talk about PvP

[Jennestia]

PvP does ruin the PvE aspect -- If the PvP becomes a decent way to progress in any form guess what people will want to do mostly? It happens in every MMO that has a good PvP system.

I prefer no PvP but if it has to be implemented, a PvP system like Ballista; As in something completely optional and out of the way.

Because no multiplayer game has ever had both good PvE and PvP right?

Let's take a look at FPSs real quick:

What do people spend the majority of their time on? The campaign(PvE) or the multiplayer pvp aspect?

If you say campaign you're lying to yourself.

[Demacia]

PvP does ruin the PvE aspect -- If the PvP becomes a decent way to progress in any form guess what people will want to do mostly? It happens in every MMO that has a good PvP system.

I prefer no PvP but if it has to be implemented, a PvP system like Ballista; As in something completely optional and out of the way.



Let's take a look at FPSs real quick:

What do people spend the majority of their time on? The campaign(PvE) or the multiplayer pvp aspect?

If you say campaign you're lying to yourself.

Right, what will people who play FPS spend the majority of their time on? A campaign, which no matter how long or how well made it is will be 100% cleared eventually, or multiplayer which has infinite replay value?

At least try to come up with a decent argument. We're talking about an MMO here. Even if PvP becomes a decent way to progress, SO WHAT? No fun allowed in XIV? If they can almost get it right in XI why not perfect it in XIV?

[Jennestia]

Right, what will people who play FPS spend the majority of their time on? A campaign, which no matter how long or how well made it is will be 100% cleared eventually, or multiplayer which has infinite replay value?

Actually, well made FPS has a campaign with replay value in order to get "100% completion". Most FPS these days have campaigns that are generally completely optional because their focus is on the Multiplayer. You're just adamant in believing people wouldn't choose PvP over PvE which you know deep down is a lie.

You're the one who hasn't come up with a "decent argument" as to why you believe PvP wouldn't overtake PvE like it does in most MMOs -- especially if PvP is lucrative.

[Demacia]

Actually, well made FPS has a campaign with replay value in order to get "100% completion". Most FPS these days have campaigns that are generally completely optional because their focus is on the Multiplayer. You're just adamant in believing people wouldn't choose PvP over PvE which you know deep down is a lie.

You're the one who hasn't come up with a "decent argument" as to why you believe PvP wouldn't overtake PvE like it does in most MMOs -- especially if PvP is lucrative.

Great, but how often will you replay the same campaign before you get bored as opposed to multiplayer where you can go against real people instead of the AI and maps you've completely memorized? The difference is that the single-player experience in ANY game will be LIMITED while the multiplayer experience is NOT.

So you're afraid of people spending too much time having fun in PvP than grinding mobs in PvE? Fine, make it so you can't really level up from PvP and give cosmetic/material rewards. I'm adamant in believing that people should have the option to play against each other in a massively multiplayer game. PvE comes first, but PvP should always be available.

[Eekiki]

Great, but how often will you replay the same campaign before you get bored as opposed to multiplayer where you can go against real people instead of the AI and maps you've completely memorized? The difference is that the single-player experience in ANY game will be LIMITED while the multiplayer experience is NOT.

That's a very good point, but why play BioShock 2 or F.3.A.R.'s multiplayer, when you could play Team Fortress 2 or Counter Strike? Fantastic multiplayer FPS's with no single-player campaign. Remember Counter-Strike: Condition Zero? A single-player campaign for Counter Strike. And it sucked.

Likewise, you have Guild Wars, an online RPG with a heavy focus on PvP. And it's great. And I think Guild Wars 2 is going to suck, because they're trying to do too much at once.

This is a general philosophy I've been thinking of lately. I think a lot of things in this world are getting too complicated. Things need to be simplified. That's why I threw away my ridiculous 5 blade fusion razor and bought a good double-edged safety blade. Thanks to that I've got the best shave I've ever had.

[Eugenics]

So you don't want pvp in the game becuase people will have something todo?, sounds like a great plan

[Verecund]

PvP wouldn't really fit in to this game I think, but... given the fact that the PvE isn't exactly stellar, I don't care at this point.

[Amadas]

PvP wouldn't really fit in to this game I think, but... given the fact that the PvE isn't exactly stellar, I don't care at this point.

Out of all the things said here, this most closely reflects my opinion. I feel like something drastic needs to happen if this game is hoping to succeed at all. I sincerely believe that if they clean up the battle system and make PvP rewarding to its own end, people might find that they like it more than they think. Some players are irrationally anti-PvP but I think they should at least be open to the thought and see how it all plays out.

[Alhanelem]

PvP is perfectly fine and cool with me as long is it is consensual between all involved, or only takes place in special areas that aren't otherwise necessary to visit.

[Kaizlu]

As others have stated, the strength of FFXIV is PvE. If PvP were to be implemented it should be after SE "fixes" the core game. I see no reason to add something more to the "to-do" list right now seeing as how the base is far from perfect.

Also, when I read/hear PvP it just reminds me of "The World" (.hack//) and all of the crazy stories about PKs and PPKs, etc..crazy I tell ya'!