Vote-Kick system suggestion

[itschowda]

Even if this was true, the issue would still remain if the tank was intentionally trolling/griefing(although some say they are one and the same). I don't care how few tanks may be online, but I do not want to keep one, who is intentionally doing nothing, or just being a prick in general. So yes, a Kick does help..until they turn around, and in-progress que for the same DF, and end up back with you.
We need SOMETHING to prevent this from happening.

I said it earlier but I guess I have to expand on it. What if your troll is the only "role" you just kicked that joins an in-progress duty. What is your suggestion then? Just 3/7-man it? There isn't much that the devs can do to prevent trolling other than try to prevent a troll's future ability to troll with banning/temporary suspension. If you're going to say "something" needs to be done, be ready with a suggestion or alternative at least.

[Tenlaius]

To Itsi,
Well, your also in a sense, defending them. If someone is intentionally being a troll/griefer, it doesn't matter their role, their is no excuse for it..at all. If the party is willing to move on with 1 less healer, DPS, or tank, and they give forth the effort? yes, I would 3/7 man it. Heck I had a Copperbell HM, where I had to use Titan Egi until we found a tank who wasn't being a prude...worked out well enough.
The idea I was pitching, would not lock them out of doing any other say..Copperbell runs, they just could not return to that same party. They could join in-progress if they want, and get another party, but they would not be given that same group.
Each party in a dungeon is their own instance, that is what I was reffering to them being locked out of.

And to Lithera, I do admit, it may not be feasible, and could be prone to being buggy as hell without thorough testing..but something is better than nothing..sometimes, isn't it?