So, 33% less DPS than a SMN. Shrug. Brings the options of more heals. However, you would need 2 heal slots to maintain the same DPS.
E.g.:
tank, tank, dps, dps, dps, hybrid ACN, hybrid ACN, healer.
Not really a net benefit.

So, 33% less DPS than a SMN. Shrug. Brings the options of more heals. However, you would need 2 heal slots to maintain the same DPS.
E.g.:
tank, tank, dps, dps, dps, hybrid ACN, hybrid ACN, healer.
Not really a net benefit.


@ Huntington - have you tried out Scholar? The healer role is slightly different, but good SCH can contribute nice DPS courtesy of the ACN toolbox. Cleric stance swaps mind/int and provides damage boost, you also keep Aero from Conj. I think all of that would miss in the Coil due to no accuracy on gear, but outside of that it may be interesting for you. Just a suggestion.
Not bothering to repeat too much of what has already been said here, I'll just answer the OPs question.
No there is not any unneeded holtility towards regular classes in this game.
Any hostility encountered is fully justified by by the detraction from your jobs role (DPS) by any false sense of utility that you think can be found by playing your base class without it's soul stone equipped.
The piddly heal that second wind provides compares nothing to the added vitality of myth gear, your souls stone and using a lv.90 weapon.
Protect is already covered by another class and you have no use for it whatsoever.
IR and B4B come nowhere near leveling out your dps loss from not equipping your soul stone and using a lv.90 weapon.
Your silly test against a dummy doesn't account for the fall-off in dps you will generate by using your "utility" skills in battle instead of sticking to dps and avoiding avoidable damage.
If you can't give us a video, give us your rotations for both SMN and ACN for dps to back up your statement that the the difference is negligible. Otherwise, I'm going to just believe the endless stream of players here that have spent more time working out the math and testing than you spent in 10 minutes testing against another person.
You will ALWAYS encounter hostility from other people when you purposefully lower your ability to perform your jobs role in a party. It will be because your willful decision to under-perform your role is considered a hostile action against the group as a whole.
When you purposefully choose to under-perform your role you are at the same time demanding more dps out of your fellow dps, more time tanking from your tank and more time healing from your healers.
The only way you could possibly not grasp that your choice is hostile would be if you sincerely believed that your dps is better as a arcanist that cannot equip 90 gear or weapons (aside from what you can pick up in turn 1&2).
In that case, please provide your rotations for both roles so that we can compare the damage difference between the two.
When your pop into a forum and declare that everyone elses' math and testing are null and that your dps is the same with both setups, you will receive condescension until you can back up your statements with proof. Whether or not you perceive someones reply as condescending doesn't devalue their argument nor provide any backing to your own.
10/10 trolling, please continue.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote


