System to curb Ready Check abuse?

[Cigaran]

Greetings,

The development team is looking into placing limitations on the use of the ready check feature, as this should not be used during battle. In addition, for patch 2.2 they are also discussing making it so the person who initiated the ready check will have their name displayed.

Hopefully the update to keep this from being used in battle doesn't wait until 2.2. This should never have gotten past QA due to the obvious, abusive nature.

[Luso]

This should never have gotten past QA due to the obvious, abusive nature.

I don't think testing is done with the mindset of an international audience.

[HaelseMikiro]

Hopefully the update to keep this from being used in battle doesn't wait until 2.2. This should never have gotten past QA due to the obvious, abusive nature.

Well, the only part that specifically says "Patch 2.2" is concerning placing the ready check initiators name up. I'm sure the "in combat" use will be implemented before.
Also, I'd disagree with adding initiator names to the vote kick or vote abandon features, as even a single use of it may bring negative retaliation against the initiator.
Instead I'd propose a timed lockout for a person after using the feature. You get 1 chance per (ie) 10 minutes to commence a vote. If it's dismissed, and a run/player is clearly in deservence of another vote, someone else will initiate it. I mean, it takes more than 1 to pass it anyways right?