Quote Originally Posted by ViolentDjango View Post
We're past this... the Retainer system is nothing more than an AH nowadays, and they've already hinted at adding the ability to add HQ items -- so outside of that there's no much missing from it, there's no real reason to waste time and resources at this point steam rolling over the system if its more or less working now -- which it is.
They have also pointed out that meerly adding a +1-2-3 to the retainer system is a massive pain, while I'm perfectly fine with the retainer system as is, there is always another direction to look towards. Retainers as hey are can't really go anywhere from what they are, and the implementation of them seems half-baked anyways.

The more we share our opinions with the developers the more they have information to ping ideas from. Are the players always right? Short answer...No.

Is giving them our opinion ever a bad thing? No.

Nobody is demanding that changes happen in a ultra specific way, we are suggesting how we want to see the market system grow as a whole and how we think it could work. Not will work, not telling them it's a must, just suggesting based on our understanding of the system.

The developers will always have the best grasp of what is implementable, and what isn't and far be it from me to suggest they do something that will take far too much time to implement.


Quote Originally Posted by ViolentDjango View Post
I'd like personal home shops, but I'd never want them to replace retainers with this.
What would the point of two market systems be other than to smother eachother?