Results 1 to 10 of 26

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Kitru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,334
    Character
    Kitru Kitera
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by DarkStar View Post
    Kitru, just thought I'd let you know, but the original depiction of Dragoons in FF, that being dragon-mounted knights, is actually VERY close to the historical Dragoon, as they were just heavy infantry that were given horses to get to the battlefield quickly. It was only when firearms were introduced that Dragoons were turned into a form of cavalry, and even then it could still be said that the FF Dragoon was still faithful to their origin. Just replace "Horse" with "Dragon" or "Wind Drake".
    First off, historical dragoons were mounted infantry which is light by necessity; if they were heavily armored/armed, they'd be better served by remaining cavalry. Their purpose was rapid deployment and movement to which heavy armor and weapons don't contribute to. As such, the heavy armor that dragoons use in games, especially Kain, who used armor as heavy as Cecil's, aren't congruous with the historical units. Furthermore, dragoons in the FF series and in modern fantasy archetype, when linked to dragons, fought while mounted on their dragons as opposed to using dragons only for mobility, which was the purpose of the horses for historical dragoons. "Infantry" is the operant word in the term "mounted infantry", and it refers to fighting on foot even if the term "mounted" generally means "on horse"; for mounted infantry, "mounted" just refers to how they get to where they're going to so that they can start fighting on foot.

    Secondly, the etymological origins of the term "dragoon", while not entirely concrete, are most likely based upon the French descriptor of the firearm carried by a specific evolution of their mounted infantry (i.e. the gun and dragons both belched fire), hence the etymological similarity of the two terms. Dragoons existed only after they began using firearms, before which they would simply have been mounted infantry.

    Now then, on topic, I'd very much like to see how SE would accomplish a Gunblade using class.
    Given how gunblades are used in game by the Garleans, I would expect it to be a DoW class that uses combo melee attacks as its baseline functionality with the non-combo attacks being ranged (think Dragoon but Heavy Thrust and Phlebotomize have a 20y range) in order to force melee to be the primary combat methodology. I'd expect to see some degree of magic-martial fusion as well; probably something like the blue fire and/or cross-slash that Gaius uses. They'd probably have slightly worse damage than the other mDPS, since they wouldn't be as screwed by short stints of being out of melee as the pure mDPS, but better than the ranged deeps.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    Zohar_Lahar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    1,381
    Character
    Zohar Lahar
    World
    Jenova
    Main Class
    Viper Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Kitru View Post
    Given how gunblades are used in game by the Garleans, I would expect it to be a DoW class that uses combo melee attacks as its baseline functionality with the non-combo attacks being ranged (think Dragoon but Heavy Thrust and Phlebotomize have a 20y range) in order to force melee to be the primary combat methodology. I'd expect to see some degree of magic-martial fusion as well; probably something like the blue fire and/or cross-slash that Gaius uses. They'd probably have slightly worse damage than the other mDPS, since they wouldn't be as screwed by short stints of being out of melee as the pure mDPS, but better than the ranged deeps.
    Though this be an old topic, its ideas seem relevant for future content (especially if 4.0+ takes us to Ala Mhigo). And I personally think gunblade would be the ideal weapon for a hybrid melee/ranged DPS class, such as Soldier or even Red Mage. The latter could take on the magical aspects you mentioned, albeit with more classical flair rather than Gaius's magitek.
    (0)