'Raids', really?

[Volsung]

First off I'd like to say you shouldnt have a problem with other people having a problem with a term. If its pointless let it be pointless. This has gone on for more pages than needed.

For me, the term doesn't bother me because of where it comes from or anything. It just sounds bland when coming out of the developers mouth, as if there is a lack of personal care to it. Its not because it "omg comes from WoW" or anything. It hits me like this "we're adding raids" "why should I care?" "They have gear" "and?" I'd like to know area history/reason for entering/ people involved etc. Usually a name ties that together. Thats my only quarrel with this issue.

[Viridiana]

First off I'd like to say you shouldnt have a problem with other people having a problem with a term. If its pointless let it be pointless. This has gone on for more pages than needed.

For me, the term doesn't bother me because of where it comes from or anything. It just sounds bland when coming out of the developers mouth, as if there is a lack of personal care to it. Its not because it "omg comes from WoW" or anything. It hits me like this "we're adding raids" "why should I care?" "They have gear" "and?" I'd like to know area history/reason for entering/ people involved etc. Usually a name ties that together. Thats my only quarrel with this issue.

I agree. It's a good thing they've given them names, then, wouldn't you agree?