'Raids', really?

[Rydin]

No, not bad at all, but a nice FF kick would make it better. Anything really that'd distinguish it from other high fantasy games and live up to its name.

Now that I will agree with.. there is a certain "cool factor" missing from this game

[Rydin]

Whats in a name? They could call it some made up name like a Stip-tin-pop and it doesn't change the nature of the thing

Truth be told, complaining over the name of something shows you have a propensity to complain and voice displeasure....

Be happy, they could have called them Sissy-runs... Or fussy-panseons
In Englad they call cigarettes "Fags"
Shouldn't you go find a Phillip Morris message board to complain on?

[Oscillate_Wildly]

Whats in a name? They could call it some made up name like a Stip-tin-pop and it doesn't change the nature of the thing

Stigma. All a matter of taste I'm afraid.

Edit: I could! But I have no idea what that is, and I have no interest in feeding the trolls. In any case, we're all entitled to our own opinions, and just because we have the right to be anonymous sarcastic piss ants doesn't mean we ought to be.

And in case that wasn't clear enough, yes I was referring to you. :3

[Rydin]

Stigma. All a matter of taste I'm afraid.

As long as they are fun, I don't care what they call them...

[Oscillate_Wildly]

Once they introduce classic Job names and more story related missions/quests we'll start to see that spark. I hope. We're just in a content drought I think waiting for this battle system patch. D:

[Reika]

Well, they aren't done modifying everything to revolve around 4 player and 8 player parties. All they really did was Reduce the max players from 15 to 8 and adjust the SP, The behest (Horrible adjustment if I might add), then add a buff for 4 and 8 players. 4 players is really meant to be a normal size group, while 8 will be the current raid size. Tho, I hope they do add more 4-player dungeons for higher ranks in the future. Making only a Raid dungeon for the high ranks and only a group dungeon for mid ranks to start off is probably a bad move. But we will see.

And yea, you will most likely need to have a job in order to be successful in the dungeons.

[Oscillate_Wildly]

Speaking of group numbers, reducing max party size from 15 was really terrible. At least in the future I do hope they add a system that allows us to consolidate 2 groups. Switching people in and out for NM hunting is becoming a right pain in the ass.

[Rydin]

Speaking of group numbers, reducing max party size from 15 was really terrible. At least in the future I do hope they add a system that allows us to consolidate 2 groups. Switching people in and out for NM hunting is becoming a right pain in the ass.

I agree about multiple parties...
15 was too big though....
I'd rather see a 2 or 3 party alliance than a 15 man group...

[Reika]

I agree about multiple parties...
15 was too big though....
I'd rather see a 2 or 3 party alliance than a 15 man group...

15 was too big for 'normal party' size, which it was considered that at the time. It is good for raid size tho.

[AngryNixon]

Nobody wants to re-brand them as box socials?