I know what I want to choose....
Ranking my WHM or BLM or any job from rank 1, not having it given to me at rank 50 already along with any other future branches /sigh
I know what I want to choose....
Ranking my WHM or BLM or any job from rank 1, not having it given to me at rank 50 already along with any other future branches /sigh
why are you still arguing this point? The consensus is for an optional system. give it a rest.no its not all about me
apperently its all about YOU
and how YOU want to make others experience the content
if YOU want to do it at 30, do it at 30
but you are telling others they have to do it your way, cuz thats how YOU want them to do it
YOU dont want them to choose how to do it
Renta, how do the Japanese feel about a cap for the dungeons?I made a post about it on the JPN side. I'm curious to see what they think about the issue.
http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/t...l=1#post194231
uncapped , mainly because when people move away from content do do new things it may be hard to find people to do the raids.
If capped i hope they make adjustment in following months or years as to the issue on caps.
Do you want Instanced Dungeons to Impose a CAP (Meaning a restriction in level that would cause you to run a dungeon as a r30 rather than a r50) on players entering.
Regarding the payment. It says on your objective that Final Fantasy 14 will be compatible for hardcore gamers and casual gamers. It is a bit unfair for casual gamers like myself to pay for a 30 days even though I am only playing half of the time (or less). Is it possible for your good office to maybe have an option for casual gamers to pay 30- gaming days, meaning whenever a player logs-in it is consider as 1 game day. Unlike the payment method that you've said before, the 30 days runs consecutively doesnt matter if you play or not.
Good try but it's not gonna work this time, allowing an optional cap would benefit more than just myself as I stated obvious reasons earlier (like helping lower level without ruining the game for them) as opposed to not allowing an optional cap which the only reason you can come up with is to let you play the game the way YOU want it. (which would still be possible for you with the optional cap)no its not all about me
apperently its all about YOU
and how YOU want to make others experience the content
if YOU want to do it at 30, do it at 30
but you are telling others they have to do it your way, cuz thats how YOU want them to do it
YOU dont want them to choose how to do it
So good try Vedis, but stop making a fool of yourself.
I vote Uncapped - leave it alone.
Like... leave Britney alone?I vote Uncapped - leave it alone.
I'd say cap it, but if they don't, then they had better be unconventional with the difficulty. Not just "mob hits hard" but traps, environment effects, areas requiring teamwork, mobs as annoying as the frog wizards.
It would be a godsend if it was randomized, but I'm not holding my breath on that one.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.