but it does remove a freedom, it removes the freedom of doing the job uncapped if you wanted to do thatIn this case you are right. If you would want to do the mid-rank dungeon in it's prime which is by playing at recommended level, these are the outcomes:
Without cap = "Hey, I don't want to clear this dungeon so easy, but
1. The class(es) I would like to play as is(are) fully capped.
2. I don't want to play with the ones I have at mid-rank.
3. I don't have any mid-rank class, only higher ones."
With cap = "I can choose any class I want to play as that is either mid-rank or over."
and more people will have jobs at or below the cap then ALL jobs over the cap
so who gets hurt more by it?
My XIVPad: http://xivpads.com?2031148
First one has a point but I don't really get the second one.
Maybe for the experience and fun? <_< Which this game currently lacks pretty much.
its simple actualy, if ALL your jobs over over 50 you shouldnt care about lower dungeons
you should be asking for more higher dungeons instead
My XIVPad: http://xivpads.com?2031148
Why shouldn't they? It's 1 of the 2 major contents we have gotten in 9 months and they should not enjoy it how it was supposed to?
My XIVPad: http://xivpads.com?2031148
Again not everything is about YOU. If all your classes are at 50 but you want to help a friend lower level without ruining the learning experience and the challenge for them, what do you do?
if you are 50 running a 25 through the dungeon you ARE ruining the challenge and learning experience for them. you cut out the whole point of GROUP content by having them clear things without an actual group. If you just want to be run through dungeons by higher level ppl thats lame.
Last edited by Azurus; 06-23-2011 at 04:33 AM.
i think he meant help his friend as a r25 also in a group of 25s not as a r50 running a r25if you are 50 running a 25 through the dungeon you ARE ruining the challenge and learning experience for them. you cut out the whole point of GROUP content by having them clear things without an actual group. If you just want to be run through dungeons by higher level ppl thats lame.
Why are you quoting me like I want that? I said exactly what you said many times. I am all in favor of cap so you don't ruin lower level experience. Being against a cap is being lame since their only argument is that if they want to steamroll content they should be allowed to and they don't say it but they probably think that SE OWES it to them.if you are 50 running a 25 through the dungeon you ARE ruining the challenge and learning experience for them. you cut out the whole point of GROUP content by having them clear things without an actual group. If you just want to be run through dungeons by higher level ppl thats lame.
ummm im against a cap, and thats not my argument.Why are you quoting me like I want that? I said exactly what you said many times. I am all in favor of cap so you don't ruin lower level experience. Being against a cap is being lame since their only argument is that if they want to steamroll content they should be allowed to and they don't say it but they probably think that SE OWES it to them.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.