You make a fair point. Like I said in my original post, I haven't done a lot of heavy stat weight testing quite yet. So today I started off by doing some Determination testing.
I still haven't gotten Garuda's casting ring (lost 4 lots on it and it never drops for me when I'm with FC :/ ) so I still had to use my spread of 244 → 281 Determination. All gear used in testing was i90, so no WD or INT fluctuation (obviously). Numbers are not including crits as my goal was just to find the rough % damage increase from stacking Determination. For each Determination value, I cast 200 Ruins and had Garuda cast 200 Wind Blades.
244 Determination:
Ruin damage range: 193-214. Average: 203.5
Wind Blade damage range: 203-224. Average: 213.5
281 Determination:
Ruin damage range: 197-218. Average: 207.5
Wind Blade damage range: 206-227. Average: 216.5
So Ruin ends up having an increase of 4 damage which is ≈2% with an increase of 37 determination, which converts to ≈0.05% more damage point of Determination for Ruin.
Wind Blade on the other hand only has an increase of 3 damage which is ≈1.4% with an increase of 37 determination, which converts to ≈0.037% more damage per point of Determination.
In all likelihood there isn't a separate formula for pet to determination straight damage increase, but it's probably something like based on your WD, INT, and base potency of the skill, each ability has a certain Det value that it needs in order to increase it's base damage by 1. So basically with 69 WD and 496 INT, Ruin would require something like 242, 253, 264, 275, 286, etc. DET in order to increase damage range by 1. However, because the formula is based on multiple factors, Wind Blade would require something like 243, 253, 263, 273, 283, etc. DET in order to increase damage range by 1. Obviously this is just conjecture on my part, however it is difficult to test for due to the linear progression of gear and the limited number of i90 pieces that I have access to in order to test it.
In any case, those are my Det testing numbers. I'll try to get some crit testing done as well, however it will take me a bit longer as crit is not a consistent increase like DET is, so I'll need a much larger sample size in order to get accurate numbers.



Reply With Quote


