Stop "fixing" the MW scrap it

[Sonic_the_Hedgehog]

Funny, I don't see any shipping options under Amazon that I would call a flawed system. The same can't be said for the market wards. I don't mind things taking time. I mind when they're fundamentally flawed and no one wants to fix them.

What do you mean? They're trying to fix them, also the compromise that Eldaena thought up is a pretty good idea and I typed up an idea a couple of pages ago.

[Eldaena]

Funny, I don't see any shipping options under Amazon that I would call a flawed system. The same can't be said for the market wards. I don't mind things taking time. I mind when they're fundamentally flawed and no one wants to fix them.

I think you're raging a little here...developers are trying to fix things and are exploring several options. Calm down, things are in the making. Just try your best to suggest good ideas and stop complaining so much...we won't get anywhere with all this negativity.

[Eldaena]

Someone had a good compromise earlier, let the people that want to buy their items from the menu be charged double or triple amount the item costs with a percentage going to the retainer owner and the ones willing to buy directly from the retainer get charged the normal amount.

I never said double or triple the amount, lol just a shipping tax of sorts. That would be way too high a cost just to buy from the menu.

[Sonic_the_Hedgehog]

I never said double or triple the amount, lol just a shipping tax of sorts. That would be way too high a cost just to buy from the menu.

Ok, not double or triple, but percentage would be good like 25 or 50.

[Chezen]

Double or triple is a good compromise for not wanting to deal with a flawed system?

No, for not using (and I'm kicking myself for saying this), what is working as intended. The Market Wards could use some tlc, no arguement there. But as Sonic said, they are meant to be market wards.

(Double or triple the item cost is a wee bit more than what I was thinking though...)

[Viridiana]

No, for not using (and I'm kicking myself for saying this), what is working as intended. The Market Wards could use some tlc, no arguement there. But as Sonic said, they are meant to be market wards.

(Double or triple the item cost is a wee bit more than what I was thinking though...)

If it were working as intended, I wouldn't mind as much. But I doubt SE intended for Battlecraft to always be full and for everyone else that wants to sell weapons to pay 2.5x as much tax. Not that I'm saying the taxes are steep--far from it, but they've actually succeeded in preventing us from doing what they were trying to encourage us to do. If that's working as intended, something is very wrong.

[Chezen]

If it were working as intended, I wouldn't mind as much. But I doubt SE intended for Battlecraft to always be full and for everyone else that wants to sell weapons to pay 2.5x as much tax. Not that I'm saying the taxes are steep--far from it, but they've actually succeeded in preventing us from doing what they were trying to encourage us to do. If that's working as intended, something is very wrong.

That part is not, I meant the idea of market wards in general, my appologies.

[Viridiana]

That part is not, I meant the idea of market wards in general, my appologies.

Oh, yeah, I do love the idea of market wards. I just don't really see it working.

[Demacia]

You guys are seriously responding to this clown huh?

Well so much for this thread. Apparently players should be punished for avoiding a blatantly flawed market system.