Results 1 to 10 of 70

Thread: SCH vs WHM

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Jyoeru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    304
    Character
    Jyoeru Zaberu
    World
    Faerie
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyomih View Post
    Y
    Not to mention SCH is just the better single player healer, hands down
    Embrace + Physic + lustrate + adlo = divine
    I don't have an SCH to agree nor disagree. But I know MMOs, and even if this is true, it won't be for long
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    Kyomih's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    249
    Character
    Kyomi Dreamweaver
    World
    Phoenix
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 63
    Quote Originally Posted by Jyoeru View Post
    I don't have an SCH to agree nor disagree. But I know MMOs, and even if this is true, it won't be for long
    It's a simple numbers game. The healing throughput with no GCD on Embrace, instant lustrate plus the normal SCH heals vs. the casting time from a WHMs single target heals (minus benediction which I don't consider an actual tool in our toolbox for healing throughput). It's more HPS on a single target. Also both Embrace and lustrate can be cast on the run while the adlo shield is up.

    Mind you, this is not a "SCH is better than WHM"- statement above. Just explaining why SCH is the more powerful single target healer.

    Sure you can Cure II and swiftcast Cure II to try to match it but it still won't be as sustainable as a SCH's HPS. Also MP wise.
    (0)