Because you play the game does not mean your numbers alone represent the overall gil in circulation. That is not a logical fact to use as your argument. Cause if what you say is true, the players who are also struggling in the market have a valid argument as well. Because they aren't logging out with more gil everyday and nor are their friends, they can conclude gil in circulation must be down.
Meaning, how can two people be true?
We also have to consider the fact that gil in circulation will be different from server to server as well. It may actually be down on some servers and up on others.
It isn't. This is why you can scroll around and find several threads saying the economy is crashing. If it was indeed as clear as daylight, we wouldn't have two different populations in the community.
You and your population of players does not represent the overall gil spent in the market. Also it may not represent every other server.
You complaining cause you have excess gil because you aren't currently interested in anything on the market. It does not allow you to conclude that their is a problem. You contradict yourself here. First, increase in gil in circulation represents that people are interested in buying things on the market. If what you claim is true that gil in circulation is going up from earlier, that means people are interested in things currently on the market. Meaning your second argument that there is no need to ever buying anything can't be argued.
1. You argue gil in circulation is going up
2. No one needs to buy anything, meaning gil in circulation should be going down.
See the massive contradiction?
Here is your next contradiction.
1. You claim gil in circulation is going up
2. No one has a need to buy anything - meaning gil in circulation is going down because if you don't buy things, there aren't gil in circulation
3. Whats the point of gil, nothing to buy - meaning gil in circulation is going down.
The thing is, 1. cannot be happening if you are claiming 2 and 3 as well. Meaning your post is a huge contradiction in itself. Meaning this reply has little to no weight when your arguments go against each other.
This is one confusing starting statement.
Gil in circulation is up but gil being spent in the market is down? Or do you mean, housing is only down?