Thread: Why did they changed this from version 1.0 ?

Its because of PS3 limitations they had to make the game run on ps3 and to do that they had to load it chock full of loading screens.

Originally Posted by Mailstrum

Its because of PS3 limitations they had to make the game run on ps3 and to do that they had to load it chock full of loading screens.

Shhh you'll make the people who are somehow convinced this game can run well on an outdated machine come out and argue. Its the ram in the ps3 look at ps3s skyrim and all the problems it had.

Originally Posted by Battlewrench

Shhh you'll make the people who are somehow convinced this game can run well on an outdated machine come out and argue. Its the ram in the ps3 look at ps3s skyrim and all the problems it had.

That's because Bethesda and SE share something in common, they suck @ coding. Do you own a PS3? And if you answered yes to that, did you see or play Assassin's Creed IV for it? The world is MASSIVE. Way bigger than skyrim. The issue with Skyrim was the game tracked everything. Even a cheese wheel on the other side of skyrim and a dead bandit you killed 2 RL months ago.

Because 1.0 was possibly the worst video game I have ever played in my life. Amazon let me return it for being defective.....

Get quest from crystal. Come back to crystal. SO MUCH FUN!

Originally Posted by Mailstrum

Its because of PS3 limitations they had to make the game run on ps3 and to do that they had to load it chock full of loading screens.

The reason I couldn't play in 1.0 was how insane the system requirements were. I'm glad for PS3 limitations... now I can finally play the game (and it looks awesome, too).