Quote Originally Posted by Sparky View Post
I think at this point it's clear that your agenda is having the argument itself, and not where the argument leads.
The argument was fees versus deterrence of re listing.

Quote Originally Posted by Sparky View Post
If all you want is to be seen to be the one who's right, and I, the one who is wrong, then congratulations. I couldn't possibly argue with one so well versed in the use of the quote post feature.
Please bear in mind, all your quotes were your ideas. I have not altered them one bit. I have only argued against them and all of your arguments against mine sprouted from just from that one argument.

Quote Originally Posted by Sparky View Post
Clearly you aren't capable of understanding that theoretically if someone could not afford to pay up front, then then can't list an item in the first place. But congratulations on cherry picking your quotes.
Once again, our entire argument was revolved around you saying a post fee is beneficial and I saying its the same as initial listing fees, it doesn't deter relisting and hurts poorer players while you argued the latter. I've not argued anything outside of that.

Quote Originally Posted by Sparky View Post
I'm out.
I've been pretty courteous and presented you logical equations up to this point arguing that one point alone.

This is a place of discussion. We point out flaws in designs, ideas and logic. It is a commonplace thing here, please to do not feel like I was solely bent on proving you wrong. If you had presented a well defined argument to back up your initial claim, I would have gladly accepted it.