Your lack of reading comprehension does not equate to what I've said being an 'assumption' but thank you for trying.


I asked for the poster's intent of a specific post and you felt the need to jump in and give me your opinion of what the poster said. My post was made specifically addressing the author of the quote asking for their intent, not to you asking for your interpretation of another person's intent. Perhaps reading comprehension is not your strong suit since you felt the need to answer a question directly posed to another?

Was it that hard for you to understand the flow of my post?
No, but it seems it was hard for you to understand mine?

If you want to be a pompous buffoon, that's on you but if you want actual intellectual debate please drop the snarky jackassery./


I want nothing from you, I asked for another poster's intent on a reply in this thread. I am curious, does the definition of jackassery include someone that feels the need to answer for someone else when the other person is asked a direct question?