The problem with allowing Turn 2 Rage strat

[NRhodes]

Because people know more about how the turn was intended to be played than the people who designed it.

Oh and I'm sure you know better than us, right?

[Sax]

Oh and I'm sure you know better than us, right?

Lern2sarcasm..... The ones who do know better than you, me, or any other crybaby here, are the people that designed it. You know, the ones that are saying that enrage is a viable solution to completing the turn.

[Noahlimits]

Lern2sarcasm..... The ones who do know better than you, me, or any other crybaby here, are the people that designed it. You know, the ones that are saying that enrage is a viable solution to completing the turn.

The same people who didn't anticipate people using two paladins to get past harder content.

While I don't care either way about the enrage thing, my confidence is not with the QA/balance/test team whatsoever.

[Wizhard]

Lern2sarcasm..... The ones who do know better than you, me, or any other crybaby here, are the people that designed it. You know, the ones that are saying that enrage is a viable solution to completing the turn.

Im just gonna post this again if you guys dont mind...

"Warriors are fine". Month later massive buff.
"Dark Devices are fine". Month later massive nerf.

If this was Blizzard and not SE this wouldve been hotfixed as soon as it appeared on the forums.