Serious issues with Alliances in CT [Trolling]

[Farkle]

Any duty finder content I do I go with JP group's. Trolls don't exist there.

[MakotoNano]

Yeah, I understand that people aren't always the best players, but its not a skill issue in these cases, its people trolling just to troll. And I can't say 100% for sure that it was a premade of 8, but that was the general thought, since all their trolling they seemed to be aware of ahead of time.

I.e. pulling atomos, then running out of the zone when the other 2 groups go in. so that they will be un able to fight an die. Multiple times. Waiting until you are about 10% on atomos then all running off the pad so yours resets to full HP, then talking shit about how slow you are at killing it.

[Kirosuu]

Any duty finder content I do I go with JP group's. Trolls don't exist there.

we so alike
always go with JP
yeah there is some mistake but everyone make one....atleast they not trolling and try their best and if any alliance cant win at atomos,they change strategy by sending 1 of other alliance member to help (happen to my alliance)

[MakotoNano]

TEXT page one

Yeah, I remember you in my party, that was a stupid run,

[Xieveral]

Yes, I am not allowed to name players on the Forums. But their FC Started with a D and possibly ended with an OMO!

If that FC is the one I think it is, I'm sorry you ran into them, some of them are jerks but they're not an adequate representation of Balmung players.

[diulalasing]

8 people have no life

/kids

[MakotoNano]

They need to add a vote kick alliance for people like them.

[NeroMD]

They need to add a vote kick alliance for people like them.

The other alliance would potentially abuse this system if this was the case. SE should've allowed for premade alliances for CT.

[indira]

i made a post about this the other day. you kick them a few seconds later right back trolling.

we NEED unlimited use of vote to kick. and getting kicked for trolling should lock you out for the total time the dungeon can run. CT 2 hours to finish = 2hr lockout. since they have nothing better to do they wont mind.

The other alliance would potentially abuse this system if this was the case. SE should've allowed for premade alliances for CT.

and the ones who abuse voting might get banned or suspended.

[MakotoNano]

The other alliance would potentially abuse this system if this was the case. SE should've allowed for premade alliances for CT.

You would limit a group to 1 ATTEMPT, per 4hrs or 8hrs or even 24hrs.

So at most, they could boot one group, and with that. BOTH the other groups have to agree to kick the 3rd. Chances of 2 groups agreeing to abuse it and kick the 3rd are extremely low, and the only way they could communicate it would be to use Alliance chat. So group 3 could just screen shot it and report the players.