"We'll Look Into It..." What's It Mean to YOU?

[Shika]

FML? =D
Feel bad for you pal.

Heheh good site ^^

And yes I'd agree that part of the problem is also some of the questions asked. I know they wanted to put players questions to the developers, but some of the ones they picked... I mean seriously? "I don't like the way the fishing rod wiggles" and "Now you increased stack sizes we don't have to make ore into nuggets to make room in inventory- is this what you intended?" Well duh *rolls eyes*, so I guess as they can't say "Don't be so f***ing stupid" or "WTF", then "We'll look into it" is the safest response lol.

Now if we could pick questions put forward through a poll, which may take longer but with the guarantee that quality questions are asked and in return quality answers are guaranteed, then that would be different.
I like the Q & A idea but the implementation is not the best in my opinion.

[Azurus]

Heheh good site ^^

And yes I'd agree that part of the problem is also some of the questions asked. I know they wanted to put players questions to the developers, but some of the ones they picked... I mean seriously? "I don't like the way the fishing rod wiggles" and "Now you increased stack sizes we don't have to make ore into nuggets to make room in inventory- is this what you intended?" Well duh *rolls eyes*, so I guess as they can't say "Don't be so f***ing stupid" or "WTF", then "We'll look into it" is the safest response lol.

Now if we could pick questions put forward through a poll, which may take longer but with the guarantee that quality questions are asked and in return quality answers are guaranteed, then that would be different.
I like the Q & A idea but the implementation is not the best in my opinion.

Yeah i agree with this 100%. I'm certain that 90% of these questions have to be from the japanese forums. Im on these forums a hell of a lot, and though trolls run rampant raping the villagers, we as a whole ask the real questions. The questions in these Q&As are stupid and useless and give no information for the most part, and what this says to me is that the devs dont want to take the questions that back them in to a corner about what actually matters in this game and they would rather answer the more..."tame"? questions about fishing rods wiggling and taking extra steps after you stop running. I know on the NA forums we could give two shites about that so until i know where these questions are coming i'm blaming every one of the other boards and they will sit in the corner until they ask better questions... Its either this or SE is picking these questions cause they fit best with the "well look in to it" template.

[Velhart]

I actually LOL'd in real life reading that... at work So now I'm getting funny looks and people onto me that I'm actually not that busy <.<

Should I have put [/sarcasm] into my post? oo;

[Molly_Millions]

I think part of it is that the interviewer wasn't asking the right questions. As one example; who the hell cares about new gathering jobs? What, exactly, isn't covered already?

[Cutriss]

I think part of it is that the interviewer wasn't asking the right questions. As one example; who the hell cares about new gathering jobs? What, exactly, isn't covered already?

Shepherd. /

[Wolfie]

To me it means that they can't analyze how X thing works and how Y proposal will affect it. Other popular MMO devs will tell you flat out that they will do Y, or something similar to Y that they already had in the works, or that they can't do Y because Z will happen. It's nothing more than an acknowledgement that they read your post; they're still keeping you in the dark about the game.

[BlackomegaKingofwaffles]

I tend to see it as a canned answer to ridiculous questions used so the feelings of the poster aren't hurt. ex "I want to give DoL jobs special special mounts based on class like a tree for a bot a boulder for a miner and fish for a fisher." That sort of thing.

[Cutriss]

I tend to see it as a canned answer to ridiculous questions used so the feelings of the poster aren't hurt. ex "I want to give DoL jobs special special mounts based on class like a tree for a bot a boulder for a miner and fish for a fisher." That sort of thing.

That's the consequence of answering *every* question as opposed to only answering the ones worth answering.

The problem is that their threshold of questions that matter tends not to cross the International Date Line.

Cheese Sandwich, anyone?

[AuctionGirl]

We'll look into it means to me: Please stop posting about this subject, we have already discussed this and made a plan for 2015 to investigate about implementing this into the game. At that time we may postpone this idea further, but as long as you stop talking about it, we did our job.

[Jennestia]

Considering "We'll look into it" has only one true meaning based on my current knowledge of the English language, it makes me feel they're actually considering the possibility.