So.. who's leveling a SCH?

[Valesken]

I personally think that WHM/SCH were just fine the way they were in 2.0. I don't understand why SE would go the "flavour of the month" route like Blizzard did with WoW...

I'm a little disappointed here.

I understand the Holy nerf though (but still, I'd like to see SE increase potency against undeads like in XI).

My 2 cents.

[vpc]

Basically what Valesken, Bellybell and Vlady have said. SCH were superior at tank healing, and WHM were superior at raid healing..they both complemented each other very well and were balanced. No whm should give 2 shits about the holy nerf, its only real use at endgame was T4 and that was if you could spare the mana/had bard playing ballad. NO ONE is calling SCH OP, that is what people are not understanding. They are just now superior at everything. What can WHM bring to the table SCH can't? Traited Stoneskin and Protect? Just invite one, have them buff your party then kick them GG

2.0 had really good synergy between the 2. Now? WHM should consider switching over and learn to play SCH efficiently because there is nothing we can do besides bring people down this patch. They should have left Medica 2 alone.

[Vlady]

Basically what Valesken, Bellybell and Vlady have said. SCH were superior at tank healing, and WHM were superior at raid healing..they both complemented each other very well and were balanced. No whm should give 2 shits about the holy nerf, its only real use at endgame was T4 and that was if you could spare the mana/had bard playing ballad. NO ONE is calling SCH OP, that is what people are not understanding. They are just now superior at everything. What can WHM bring to the table SCH can't? Traited Stoneskin and Protect? Just invite one, have them buff your party then kick them GG

2.0 had really good synergy between the 2. Now? WHM should consider switching over and learn to play SCH efficiently because there is nothing we can do besides bring people down this patch. They should have left Medica 2 alone.

\

I agree with you for the most part but if you had a good warrior a white mage was actually a better healer then scholar with proper rotation of Stoneskin. But with the changes to warriors and the boost to lustrate that may no longer be the case.

[vpc]

\

I agree with you for the most part but if you had a good warrior a white mage was actually a better healer then scholar with proper rotation of Stoneskin. But with the changes to warriors and the boost to lustrate that may no longer be the case.

Yeah SS on Warriors was much more efficient than a heal at times, however good Warriors were few and far between on Leviathan. Most of them had switched over to PLD for fear of not being invited to coil (even though if you were a good WAR it wouldn't make that much difference) so I've really only been able to deal with Paladins at end game As you said though, will no longer even be debatable.

[Taruranto]

just now superior at everything. What can WHM bring to the table SCH can't? Traited Stoneskin and Protect? Just invite one, have them buff your party then kick them GG

2.0 had really good synergy between the 2. Now? WHM should consider switching over and learn to play SCH efficiently because there is nothing we can do besides bring people down this patch. They should have left Medica 2 alone.

Yes, WHM is now completely useless, I can't even image parting with one right now, it's even worse than 2.0 WAR OMG. I hope I don't get WHM for CT cuz I'm totallly dumping down the party then.


For those who don't get it, this is sarcasm.

[vpc]

Yes, WHM is now completely useless, I can't even image parting with one right now, it's even worse than 2.0 WAR OMG. I hope I don't get WHM for CT cuz I'm totallly dumping down the party then.


For those who don't get it, this is sarcasm.

Whatever group you run with is obviously not about efficiency, it's ok I know some people like to just make things harder for themselves for no reason at all