Results -9 to 0 of 133

Threaded View

  1. #21
    Player
    Eriane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    147
    Character
    Ire Valkyr
    World
    Siren
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Taerra View Post
    ^ THIS !!!!

    Your lack of faith in your job ( or expertise ?) has to be low to have you to flip the switch and hop on the bandwagon because they MODIFIED medica II ( they did not technically nerf it per say ). And holy well .. let's face it, it's not the end of the world, we're not pure DPS. I'd QQ a LOT more if I'd be a bard or a smn though. Some classes had it a lot more rough than we did.
    I'm concerned about the reading comprehension of people here.

    Just cuz i'm lazy and i really don't feel like explaining again.

    Quote Originally Posted by Eriane View Post
    What you fail to grasp is that sch were fine, borderline better in the first place before changes.
    A sch microing the fairy would put many whm to shame in effectiveness in coil. Lest we forget that t5 in particular seems to favor sch mechanics, like lustrate not being affected by healing debuffs. This is not about player skill, it is about the toolkit and mana/threat management.

    Now with pet fixes sch is even easier to manage. Whm raid healing is not what was nerfed, the mana efficiency and threat is what took a hit. And both were bad to begin with compared to sch. What was buffed was whm burst aoe healing (which still requires a raid to stack) which isn't even required in turn 1-5.
    And i'm pretty sure i said i wasn't throwing my whm away, rather i intend to level another healing class that shares most of my gear that got some nice fixes and a buff this patch.
    (0)
    Last edited by Eriane; 12-18-2013 at 03:17 AM.