Results 1 to 10 of 59

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Castillan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    129
    Character
    Castillan Lionheart
    World
    Zalera
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Moirear View Post
    This reminds me that there are still too many people that don't understand percentages or probability.
    I understand probability quite well. Did statistics in University. When I frequently see sequences that have less than a 1 in 100,000 chance occurring, every 500 chances or so, and others complain of the same thing, we're either all incredibly unlucky, or the system is prone to excessively long sequences of extreme values.

    Frankly though, I'd be happier if they just did away with the RNG entirely, and introduced some form of Fatigue factor, that increases with every action, and once full, the next action is going to fail. Various abilities increase fatigue more, while various traits decrease the rate of fatigue growth.


    Do the same thing as well, but for HQ gatherings. When you gather, your HQ meter fills, and then once full, you get an HQ hit, and it resets with any full surplus carried over.

    Such a system would remove the immense frustration that many feel with an RNG. I hate RNG's in MMO's period (excluding combat). If I'm a skilled artisan or botanist, it's only a matter of time, not chance, that I'll HQ something.
    (0)

  2. 12-13-2013 08:25 PM

  3. #3
    Player
    Moirear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    254
    Character
    Biuma Arvinda
    World
    Goblin
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Castillan View Post
    I understand probability quite well. Did statistics in University. When I frequently see sequences that have less than a 1 in 100,000 chance occurring, every 500 chances or so, and others complain of the same thing, we're either all incredibly unlucky, or the system is prone to excessively long sequences of extreme values.
    You're all incredibly unlucky, because some others are incredibly lucky. My results are fairly average.

    That's just how it can go. And most RNGs are basically pseudo-RNGs because they're not based on natural phenomenas that are truly random, so they can occasionally be perceived as prone to extreme values.

    You're doing the math on a few samples, but you'd have to gather the data from all players, all checks, all the time to get a more reliable picture of how well the system works at acting random.
    (0)