Light/full Party buff

[Asmeret]

I come off as whining and crying like a baby, in your opinion? Using proper grammar, sentence structure, and organized paragraphs is usually not a common tool of whiners. Addressing each counter-point with my own reasoning without resorting to name-calling is not a common tool of crybabies.

Care to find a particular quote of mine that embodies this bad attitude I seem to embrace?

/10 Chars.

[Rentahamster]

/10 Chars.

That's your idea of a "bad attitude"?

lol

[Ilean]

Well thought whining is still whining.

[Rentahamster]

Well thought whining is still whining.

OK dude, whatever you say.

I'm glad you think my arguments are "well thought-out", regardless.

[Ilean]

OK dude, whatever you say.

I'm glad you think my arguments are "well thought-out", regardless.

As long as you admit you are whining.

[Rentahamster]

As long as you admit you are whining.

Nope, you are equating any kind of negative criticism as "whining" and that is not a fair assessment.

Anyhow, the argument about the style of my presentation is irrelevant to the subject at hand. Both the OP and I have shown how there are flaws in the design of the light/full party buff system and that it could use some fixing. Compared to the other problems this game has, it really isn't that big a deal, but that does not negate the fact that the party buff is badly designed.

If anyone else has any points to make about how the party buff is actually an example of good design, then feel free to make them.

[Ilean]

If anyone else has any points to make about how the party buff is actually an example of good design, then feel free to make them.

Whine whine whine.

You didn't show any real flaw. All you did is provide your very subjective view on it, ignoring the fact that we haven't got any new content since the party buff was introduced.

Until you have concrete flaw that it is hurting the game, you are whining.

Oh and AFKing doesn't count, nobody cares if people grind with an afker on autofollow, and the exploit can be reasonably fixed easily.

Please, QQ more.

[Asmeret]

Whine whine whine.

You didn't show any real flaw. All you did is provide your very subjective view on it, ignoring the fact that we haven't got any new content since the party buff was introduced.

Until you have concrete flaw that it is hurting the game, you are whining.

Oh and AFKing doesn't count, nobody cares if people grind with an afker on autofollow, and the exploit can be reasonably fixed easily.

Please, QQ more.

While I don't agree with the way you say it, I do agree with you.

[Rentahamster]

You didn't show any real flaw. All you did is provide your very subjective view on it, ignoring the fact that we haven't got any new content since the party buff was introduced.

So in your subjective opinion, getting rewarded with a 5% or 10% performance boost for adding useless players who do not contribute at all to battle is an example of good game design?

Please, tell me more.

Additionally, I have already gone over why any new content is irrelevant to the subject at hand.

That's the point I'm trying to make.

If the dungeon content is too hard for just a 4-man party without the buff, why design it that way?

Design the dungeon content to be just right for a 4-man party without the buff from the start.

Is there any particular reason why a 5% across the board boost somehow makes dungeon content balancing easier? No, there isn't. It's a 5% global boost. It's not specific to anything.

[Ilean]

So in your subjective opinion, getting rewarded with a 5% or 10% performance boost for adding useless players who do not contribute at all to battle is an example of good game design?

In my subjective opinion (and opinions always are) it's being exploited and needs to be fixed i.e. by making the bonus wear off after one minute unless at least 4 (or 8) players have performed an action.


And why design content around the buff? I guess to encourage party play, who cares? You are whining over a lolincrease of 5-10% acc, macc, hp and mp.