SE Censoring Emote ability due to select few is not the answer.

[Edellis]

I think with this thread, i'm done visiting general discussion with any intent of finding useful discussion. I cannot believe this has reached 6 pages of QQ about something to ridiculously trivial.

So square wants to keep the visual integrity of the overworld intact by not letting idiots run around /trust-ing in people's mouths and giggle to themselves. It doesn't hurt anyone to be able to do it, but it most certainly isn't hurting anyone who cant. If it does, then that's a different issue in itself.

And i thought League of Legends' GD was bad.

[Shadowtrek]

I think with this thread, i'm done visiting general discussion with any intent of finding useful discussion. I cannot believe this has reached 6 pages of QQ about something to ridiculously trivial.

So square wants to keep the visual integrity of the overworld intact by not letting idiots run around /trust-ing in people's mouths and giggle to themselves. It doesn't hurt anyone to be able to do it, but it most certainly isn't hurting anyone who cant. If it does, then that's a different issue in itself.

And i thought League of Legends' GD was bad.

Just because it's not important to you does not mean it's not important to somebody.

[frostmagemari]

Just because it's not important to you does not mean it's not important to somebody.

*Nods* Though, what's important to me isn't so much the ability to lay down where-ever i please, but rather the fact that SQE feels that it should censor and nanny us, as if we can't handle what happens in the game.