I didn't say do away with numbering, actually I said Regen II within the same post, or agreed with it.
I'm fine with numbering, but when the actual function of an ability changes is where the name change comes in, which is more what I was driving at. Numbering should denote level/potency/cost, but the effect from a 1, 2, 3 should not change aside from level/potency/cost, it isn't intuitive.
Someone else already picked apart the old naming conventions, when the cure spells were freely changed between single target and party wide. The spells for most of the FF series were name Cure > Cura > Curaga > Curasa > Curaja, or Cure1...Cure5. But the effect was the same for them regardless.
In previous FF titles that have utilized separate single/multi target effects the convention has been Cure/Fire/Blizzard for single, and Curaga/Firaga/Bizzaga for multi.
When you change what a thing does you have changed the thing and should therefore change the things name.
Edit: and one day I'll get to post over 1000 characters w/o editing ...



Reply With Quote







