Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 47

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Ziar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ul'Dah
    Posts
    52
    Character
    Ramiel Zeruel
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Fisher Lv 52
    20fps seems awfully low for a single monitor

    I pull 46 on tripple monitor set up. Although my processor is better there shouldnt be that much of a gap

    780gtx
    I7 4770k
    stock clocks

    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    ispano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    2,753
    Character
    Melfina Amastacia
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Lancer Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Ziar View Post
    20fps seems awfully low for a single monitor

    I pull 46 on tripple monitor set up. Although my processor is better there shouldnt be that much of a gap

    780gtx
    I7 4770k
    stock clocks

    His CPU is a 1st Generation i7 compared to your 4th Generation i7. It's also only 2.8 Ghz, which is on the lower end for the Generation. I run a 4670k @ 4.4Ghz and SLI GTX 780s, I get 60 pretty much everywhere except a few rare places, all at 2560x1600.
    (0)

  3. #3
    Player
    Arcaloid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    227
    Character
    Arcana Holo
    World
    Tonberry
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Ziar View Post
    20fps seems awfully low for a single monitor

    I pull 46 on tripple monitor set up. Although my processor is better there shouldnt be that much of a gap

    780gtx
    I7 4770k
    stock clocks
    Interesting, reading through all early replies I thought the reason would be my CPU's 2.8G clock rate (during game it will be OC a little to nearly 3.0G), since those with hight fps all have CPU OCed to like 4.5+.
    But if yours is stock clock, which is 3.5G, that's not that much better than mine.
    Maybe I'll try to OC a bit more to like 3.2G and see if there is much improvement. Otherwise the later generation of CPU may be something more than just higher clock rate.

    Quote Originally Posted by ispano View Post
    His CPU is a 1st Generation i7 compared to your 4th Generation i7.
    Quote Originally Posted by Aysha_Alese View Post
    final fantasy 14 does not like 1st gen i7 processors
    For the reason above I start to believe this now...
    (0)
    Last edited by Arcaloid; 12-04-2013 at 03:21 PM.

  4. #4
    Player
    ispano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    2,753
    Character
    Melfina Amastacia
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Lancer Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Arcaloid View Post
    Interesting, reading through all early replies I thought the reason would be my CPU's 2.8G clock rate (during game it will be OC a little to nearly 3.0G), since those with hight fps all have CPU OCed to like 4.5+.
    But if yours is stock clock, which is 3.5G, that's not that much better than mine.
    Maybe I'll try to OC a bit more to like 3.2G and see if there is much improvement. Otherwise the later generation of CPU may be something more than just higher clock rate.
    You would be mistaken. You forget that your CPU is a 1st generation, Ziar's is 4th Gen. Each Gen can do more per clock than the previous. So that 700Mhz difference is quite a bit more in reality.
    (0)

  5. #5
    Player
    KenzieLynch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    349
    Character
    Kenzie Lynch
    World
    Leviathan
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 50
    It's going to be funny to see all the people who drag on PS3 players shocked when the PS4 version hits and has the best performance. They can optimise it to no end.
    (0)

  6. #6
    Player
    ispano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    2,753
    Character
    Melfina Amastacia
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Lancer Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by KenzieLynch View Post
    It's going to be funny to see all the people who drag on PS3 players not know what do when the PS4 version becomes the best performer. They can optimise the hell out of it.
    Nah, PC will still be the best, so long as you build it right.
    (2)

  7. #7
    Player
    KenzieLynch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    349
    Character
    Kenzie Lynch
    World
    Leviathan
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by ispano View Post
    Nah, PC will still be the best, so long as you build it right.

    For a select few. For most the better option will be PS4.

    When I say best performance I mean best optimisation btw
    (0)

  8. #8
    Player
    Hanemakikaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    405
    Character
    Hanemakikaze Shadowmourne
    World
    Faerie
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by KenzieLynch View Post
    For a select few. For most the better option will be PS4.

    When I say best performance I mean best optimisation btw
    A select few? It doesn't take much at all to run this dated game on high with more than reasonable fps, highest players on screen and max view distance.

    If this were 1.0, that'd be another story all together, complete resource hog.

    The funny thing about this is, even with ps4 it's still not going to perform even close to as good as a modern day (gaming)pc that's around the same price of an xbox one.

    Not saying PC is master race or anything but currently the difference between the console & PC version is so night and day I feel like they ripped console players off.
    (2)

  9. #9
    Player
    Pseudopsia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    1,078
    Character
    Kare Ruhts
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 57
    Quote Originally Posted by KenzieLynch View Post
    It's going to be funny to see all the people who drag on PS3 players shocked when the PS4 version hits and has the best performance. They can optimise it to no end.
    Don't drink Sony's koolaid.

    PS4 isn't immune to this, and SE will have to do a lot of optimizations because the PS4 hardware is weaker than OP's specs. The PS4 doesn't even render BF4 at native 1080p. SE set the PC version to draws up to 100 characters on the screen; the PS3 is set to 40 characters and it still struggles in popular fates.

    PS4 is a very good option for those who can't afford a $700+ PC.
    (2)

  10. #10
    Player
    Linadae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    568
    Character
    Dracyn Navarre
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Red Mage Lv 80
    Ok that is just odd... I have a gt 430 and an i7 processor and I have a steady 20-25 fps well...pretty much everywhere. Odin, svara, DD(before it was secretly fixed/nerfed), revant's toll, and even the empty mid level zones that no one does fates in. My fps never changes...
    (0)
    No more cast bars for Bard! Thank you, Yoshi-P! All hail our lord and savior!

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast