Results 1 to 10 of 14

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Altimis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Unknow
    Posts
    423
    Character
    Altimis Farron
    World
    Aegis
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 50
    Monk damage is Blunt not Bash, to be correct lol
    (4)

  2. #2
    Player
    Kitru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,334
    Character
    Kitru Kitera
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Altimis View Post
    Monk damage is Blunt not Bash, to be correct lol
    Actually, it's bludgeoning, if you want to be entirely semantic about it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hanabira View Post
    As a war, you should know that he means how the CURRENT storm's eye debuff works lol. It basically increases the war and pld's dmg.. not sure if -10% slashing resistance = +10% damage though.
    A 10% reduction in resistance equates to an 11.1% increase in damage dealt (1 / .9).
    (0)

  3. #3
    Player
    Lex_Luger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    63
    Character
    Lex Luger
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Kitru View Post
    Actually, it's bludgeoning, if you want to be entirely semantic about it.



    A 10% reduction in resistance equates to an 11.1% increase in damage dealt (1 / .9).
    Uh no, it's blunt damage. In every FF game its been called "Blunt" damage, and in this game on any items that provide a bonus resistance toward it, its called "Blunt" damage. Bludgeoning is not said anywhere, so semantically, you are incorrect.
    (2)

  4. #4
    Player
    Kitru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,334
    Character
    Kitru Kitera
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Lex_Luger View Post
    Uh no, it's blunt damage. In every FF game its been called "Blunt" damage, and in this game on any items that provide a bonus resistance toward it, its called "Blunt" damage. Bludgeoning is not said anywhere, so semantically, you are incorrect.
    Well I'll be damned. Could've sworn it said bludgeoning. I stand corrected.
    (2)