About RNG..

[Steeled]

If you're that certain the RNG is broken, you need only prove it.

Burden of proof is on you.

"What if"s without evidence mean nada.

I don't think there's anything wrong with the RNG but how do you expect people to prove something regarding droprates? I went 1/55 on my ifrit's sword which is... a stretch but is the way of randomness. In the 20 Garudas I had to do for scholar book, I saw SMN book 9 times. Again, odd.

How would you want a person to prove it other than providing personal experience that demonstrates it?

Why can't the proof be on the defenders. You claim something is fact, so prove it. Do 100 garudas and log the drops. It's reasonable to assume you'd see at least 8 of each drop, right, or even 6? Except that, according to a lot of people, you won't. You'll see a disproportionate amount of summoner books.

Isn't it odd that summoner books, the only class 2.0 added, *feel like* the most common drop? One could argue that smn is more common than sch because SE felt that a summoner is more likely to have competition for the drop (not true, but they might have felt it)