Quote Originally Posted by wlakiz View Post
"Sit in Sword Oath all day long" doesn't mean you will actually be attacking all day long, unless you're telling me that you would eat weights, bombs and landslides just so you can put in more dps? Warriors' burst is more useful and effective in killing Ifirit spikes, we can kill garuda's plums more effectively than pally's sword oath auto attack. We can get people out of gaols and burst the heart down better than a pally in sword oath.

Turn 1: You won't be tanking in sword oath for first 2 stacks because your snap aggro generation is terrible, unless you tell the dps to hold back. Warriors can actually hold aggro without defiance on thanks to our burst.
Turn 2. Again, you won't be using sword oath, cause your aggro gen sucks. If we OT we would do more damage cause we can mitigate the slashing resistance with our debuff.. you can't.
Turn 4. Again, shitty aggro generation any time you want to tank with Sword Oath.
Turn 5. Our Burst is better for dreadknight, conflags, snakes.. etc. Your sword oath doesn't provide much benefits to those mechanics.

Your 300 pot skill assumes you have full hp.. not likely to happen when you're tanking in sword oath and not sure about which skill you are referring to with the 250 pot. Warrior's 300 pot is unmitigated in any stance, with ~20s cooldown, we have constant crit%, miam + slashing debuff.

If you truly believe an OT pally would provide the same dps utility as an OT warrior then there's nothing more I can say.
Since you appear to have no idea what you are talking about I suggest you refrain from posting any further comments.