It is as Genma said. It was an oversight to include two attacks with the same name, hence this macro issue.


It is as Genma said. It was an oversight to include two attacks with the same name, hence this macro issue.

As much as I remember that being said months ago, it is still an issue and shouldn't be overlooked because it is explained. They could change the name of the ability as a way to fix this. Such as:
Piercing Thrust (keeps the naming scheme in line with the other normal attacks)
Kabob
Pierce (change the other Fencer ability instead)
Hail Il Palazzo!


"We'll look into it"As much as I remember that being said months ago, it is still an issue and shouldn't be overlooked because it is explained. They could change the name of the ability as a way to fix this. Such as:
Piercing Thrust (keeps the naming scheme in line with the other normal attacks)
Kabob
Pierce (change the other Fencer ability instead)![]()
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote



